Accuracy of Digital vs Conventional Denture Impressions: An In Vivo Study
NCT07377890 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10
Last updated 2026-01-30
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the accuracy of two denture impression techniques, digital intraoral scanning and conventional border-molded impressions, in adults who have lost all their teeth (fully edentulous patients).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is a digital intraoral scan as accurate as a conventional impression for capturing the shape of the mouth, including movable gum areas? Are repeated digital scans consistent (precise) when taken multiple times on the same patient? Researchers will compare digital impressions taken with an intraoral scanner to conventional impressions made with custom trays and border molding to see if digital scans can match the accuracy of the traditional "gold standard" method.
Participants will:
Attend Dubai Dental Hospital for two study visits. Have their mouth scanned three times using a digital intraoral scanner. Have a conventional impression taken using a custom tray and high-accuracy material after border molding.
Provide informed consent and allow their impression data to be analyzed for accuracy.
Conditions
- Edentulism
- Complete Dentures
- Digital Impression Accuracy
- Dental Impression Techniques
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Digital and conventional impressions
Participants will first receive digital intraoral scanning of their fully edentulous upper and/or lower jaw using the TRIOS 5 intraoral scanner (3Shape). The scanning process follows a structured sequence to capture the entire arch, including the palate and ridge slopes. Each arch will be scanned three times during the same visit to assess precision (consistency of repeated scans). Then the same participants will also undergo a conventional impression procedure using a custom tray and border molding technique.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-10-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-05-01
- Completion
- 2026-06-01
Countries
- United Arab Emirates
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Accuracy of 3D Printed Complete Dentures Using Two Impression Techniques: RCT
NCT04982510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Tooth Modified Scan Bodies as a Novel Technique
NCT06177782 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Intraoral Photogrammetry vs Optical Scanners for Immediate Full-Arch Implant Loading
NCT07320729 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trueness of Full Arch Scans and Generated Digital Implant Models
NCT06281002 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy Evaluation of Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study
NCT06393582 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Digitalized Impression on Single Peri-implant Soft Tissue Profile
NCT06702969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs Conventional Impressions Study
NCT03146780 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing the Influence of Implant Scanning Techniques on the Accuracy of Maxillary Complete-Arch Digital Scans for Implant Overdentures: A Comparative Clinical Study
NCT07295899 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
"Patient Satisfaction with Intra-Oral Vs. Extra-Oral Scanned 3D-Printed Dentures: an in Vivo Study"
NCT06846619 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Digital vs Conventional Prosthetic Rehab & Occlusal Analysis in Edentulous Patients
NCT07164066 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Accuracy of Conventional Scan Bodies, Intra-oral Photogrammetry, and Calibrated Scan Flags in Full-Arch Implant Scanning
NCT07200440 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Conventional Versus 3-D Printed Complete Denture Regarding Retention, Accuracy, Elctromyographic Activity and Patient Satisfaction.
NCT05834530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoral Scanning Accuracy in the Edentulous Mandible
NCT05032170 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Accuracy of Scannable Healing Abutments for Implant Impressions
NCT07393269 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Evaluation of Accuracy for Removable Partial Denture Frameworks
NCT06412159 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Two Methods of Making Impressions for Complete-arch Implant Supported Fixed Prosthesis
NCT06343441 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Precision of Complete-arch Digital Implant Impressions With Intraoral Scanning Versus Photogrammetry
NCT05972148 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Accuracy of Full-arch Implant Digital and Conventional Impressions.
NCT07190820 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-dimensional Accuracy of Direct Digital Scanning for All on Four Implants in Comparison to a Custom-made Verification Jig in Fully Edentulous Patients
NCT07106177 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Technique for Border Molding in Complete Dentures Using Light-Cured
NCT04853459 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction and Chewing Efficiency Between Conventional and 3D Printed Complete Dentures.
NCT06103019 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Wear and Muscular Efficiency of 3D Printed Versus Conventional Denture Teeth: A Cross-Over In Vivo Study
NCT07035574 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Biting Force and Chewing Efficiency of Complete Dentures.
NCT04793503 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Precision of Three Different Scanbodies Used for Direct Digitalization Technique
NCT05790148 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Adding Zirconium Oxide Nanoparticles to Printable Implant Overdenture
NCT06116877 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA