Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Stones.

NCT04153461 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 210

Last updated 2019-11-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The EUA Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel meta-analysis suggest that mPNL is at least as efficacious and safe as sPNL for the removal of renal calculi. However, the quality of the evidence was poor, drawn mainly from small studies, the majority of which were single-arm case series, and only one of which was RCT. The risks of bias and confounding were high, highlighting the need for more reliable data from RCTs. So, the Panel recommended for more clinical research .

The aim of this study is to compare between PNL and mPNL through a randomized controlled trial.

Conditions

  • Urolithiasis
  • Stone;Renal
  • Nephrolithiasis
  • PNL
  • PCNL
  • NEPHROLITHOTOMY
  • MINIPERC

Interventions

PROCEDURE

MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY

MINIPERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY USING NEPHROSCOPY 15 FR, LASER DUSTING OF THE STONE, NEPHROSTOMY TUBE 12 FIXATION

PROCEDURE

STANDARD PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY

PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY USING NEPHROSCOPY 24 FR, ULTRASOUND OR LITHOCLAST DISINTEGRATION OF THE STONE AND FORCEPS EXTRACTION OF THE FRAGMENTS, NEPHROSTOMY TUBE 22 FIXATION

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-05-01
Primary Completion
2021-05-01
Completion
2021-05-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04153461 on ClinicalTrials.gov