Evaluation of Post-operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite Versus the Nano Resin Composite.
NCT03792178 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2019-01-07
Summary
Our study evaluated and compared the postoperative sensitivity of the placement technique (incremental and bulk fill) in class II posterior composite resin restorations bonded with two different adhesive strategies (self-etch and etch-and-rinse).Sixty patients were randomly selected, their age range from 25 to 40 years old. They were divided into 2 main groups according to the packing technique of composite material; incremental Tetric Evoceram and Tetric Evoceram bulk fill composite.30 patients (n=30) were selected for incremental Tetric Evoceram composite restorations and they were equally divided according to the adhesive systems used (etch and rinse or self-etch adhesive strategy) (n=15 teeth).30 patients (n=30) were selected for Tetric Evoceram bulk fill composite restorations and they were equally divided according to the adhesive systems used (etch and rinse or self-etch adhesive strategy) (n=15 teeth).Post-operative pain assessed at 24 hours, 1 week and 1 month using the visual Analog Scale Score (VAS).Each patient was instructed to place a vertical mark on the VAS line at home to indicate the intensity of pain at each assessment period.
Conditions
- Sensitivity
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Bulk fill composite
Composite resin dental material
- OTHER
-
Nano resin composite
Dental composite material
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator OTHER
-
Rasmia Mamdouh Ali Salem
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2016-09-03
- Completion
- 2017-04-25
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill Restorative and Nano-fill Resin Composite
NCT04320576 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Different Methods of Resin Composite Application In Class II Restorations
NCT02185573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of ART Restorations Using Two Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials in Primary Molars
NCT06771362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Composites With Incrementally Layered Conventional Composites
NCT07078110 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Esthetic Restorations Placed in Primary Molars With Composite Resin Enriched With Insoluble Anti Bacterial Nano Particles
NCT00389714 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fil Hybrid Composite in Primary Molars
NCT06724939 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Ion-releasing Bulk-fill Restorative Materials Posterior Cavities
NCT05952609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT04306549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Psychological Impact of Colored Restorations Cement in Primary Molars
NCT05557682 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Comparison of Composite Materials
NCT06058026 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cost-efficacy Between ART and Composite Resin Restorations in Primary Molars
NCT02562456 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retrospective Evaluation of Posterior Direct Restorations
NCT04827823 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A RCT to Compare Post-operative Sensitivity of Restorations With Fill-Up, a Dual Curing Composite and Conventional Composite Resin
NCT03513692 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of a New Resin-based Composite Filling Material
NCT00738647 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Composite Using With Adhesives With or Without Chlorhexidine
NCT06257108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Composite Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT04565860 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Restorations in Permanent Teeth
NCT05583682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Shortening the Etching Time on the Clinical Performance of Resin Composite Restorations in Primary Teeth
NCT02969538 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Patients Risk Factors on the Longevity of Aesthetic Restorations
NCT03834636 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Evaluation of Two Low-shrinkage Composites
NCT03708510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of 2-year Clinical Performance of Two Different Single Color Universal Composite Resin Restorative Materials.
NCT06125132 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Clinical Evaluation Between a Novel Self Adhesive and Conventional Bulk-fill Composites
NCT06120868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Alkasite-based Restorations in Children
NCT07263555 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of An Alkasite Based Restorative Material With And Without Adhesive
NCT06273410 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA