MedTrace Logo

Clinical Comparison of Different Flowable Resin Composites

NCT04324008 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28

Last updated 2025-12-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate a self-adhesive flowable resin composite, a flowable resin composite with high viscosity and a conventional flowable resin composite in combination with a universal adhesive using two different application modes. All patients will receive at least 4 occlusal restorations. Cavities will be divided into four groups according to restorative systems used: Constic (a self-adhering flowable composite), G-ænial Universal Flo (a highly filled flowable composite), Tetric N-Flow (self-etch) (a conventional flowable composite), Tetrin N-Flow (etch\&rinse).

Conditions

  • Tooth Diseases

Interventions

DEVICE

Constic

Flowable resin composite

DEVICE

G-ænial Universal Flo

Flowable resin composite

DEVICE

Tetric N-Flow (self-etch)

Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, self-etch mode)

DEVICE

Tetric N-Flow (etch&rinse)

Tetric N-Flow (Tetric N-Bond Universal, etch\&rinse mode)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hacettepe University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-11-01
Primary Completion
2018-01-01
Completion
2026-11-01

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04324008 on ClinicalTrials.gov