Clinical Performance of Novel Alkasite Restorative Material "Cention Forte" in Class II Restorations
NCT06833528 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 38
Last updated 2025-02-18
Summary
Background \& Rationale:
Self-adhesive materials eliminate the need for adhesive protocols, offering advantages for direct restorations. The bulk-fill technique simplifies application by allowing a single-layer restoration. Glass ionomer cements (GICs) provide benefits such as fluoride release, remineralization, and moisture tolerance but have limitations, including poor aesthetics and low mechanical strength. To overcome these, hybrid materials combining GIC properties with composite durability have emerged.
Cention Forte, a capsulated alkasite restorative material, offers high flexural strength (\>100 MPa), bioactivity, and ease of application. The manufacturer claims it is an ideal posterior restorative, potentially replacing composite resins and amalgam. Given that composite restorations fail more frequently in patients with isolation difficulties, limited mouth opening, or parafunctional habits, alternative materials are needed. This study evaluates Cention Forte as an alternative to conventional composites.
Objective:
To compare the clinical performance of Cention Forte with a universal composite resin (G-aenial Achord, GC) in Class II restorations over 18 months using FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.
Hypothesis:
H₀: No significant difference between Cention Forte and composite resin after 18 months based on FDI criteria.
Primary Endpoint: At least 90% of restorations remain intact at 18 months with no significant differences in clinical performance.
Study Design:
A randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial with 30 healthy volunteers (18-35 years old), each receiving two restorations (one with Cention Forte, one with G-aenial Achord). Bite-wing radiographs will be taken before and after treatment, and at 6 , 12 and 18 months.
Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion:
* 18-35 years old, systemically healthy.
* Brushing twice daily, at least 20 teeth in occlusion.
* At least two interproximal Class II lesions.
* Signed informed consent.
Exclusion:
* Pregnancy/lactation.
* Advanced periodontal disease, bruxism, malocclusion.
* Allergy to resin materials or local anesthesia.
* Endodontically treated teeth or pulp capping cases.
Restorative Procedure:
Study Group (Cention Forte):
Self-etch primer applied, followed by Cention Forte placement and light-curing.
Control Group (G-aenial Achord, GC):
Selective enamel etching with 37% phosphoric acid, followed by G-Premio Universal Adhesive and incremental layering with light-curing.
Clinical Evaluations (FDI Criteria):
Aesthetic properties: Color match, marginal discoloration, anatomical form. Functional properties: Fracture resistance, marginal adaptation, occlusal wear, proximal contact.
Biological properties: Postoperative sensitivity, secondary caries, periodontal response.
Scoring: 1 (excellent) to 5 (unacceptable).
Statistical Analysis:
Chi-square/Fisher's Exact Test: Compare clinical performance. Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Evaluate performance over time. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis: Assess restoration longevity. p \< 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Ethical Considerations \& Data Management:
Ethical approval from Hacettepe University Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Registration on ClinicalTrials.gov. Data secured and encrypted, accessible only to authorized personnel.
Expected Impact:
This study will assess whether Cention Forte is a viable alternative to composites, particularly for challenging clinical cases where isolation and durability are concerns.
Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Dental Caries Class II
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
tooth restoration
restoration of class II cavities
- DEVICE
-
tooth restoration
restoration of class II cavities
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hacettepe University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 35 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-07-13
- Primary Completion
- 2025-03-01
- Completion
- 2027-03-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of "Cention Forte" Restorative Material
NCT04796974 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of a Highly-filled Flowable Composite in Class III Restorations.
NCT07051551 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Bioactive Material
NCT04825379 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Different Composite Materials in Class III and IV Restorations.
NCT07343063 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Composite Resins in Class I Cavities
NCT06192667 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the 2-year Clinical Performances of Class II Restorations Using Different Restorative Materials
NCT06562868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Restorative Materials
NCT06109987 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Comparison of Resin-hybrid Ceramic Restorations Produced Using a Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) System With Fiber-reinforced Composite Restorations
NCT06496126 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT06212141 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A 24-month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT03527953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Alkasite Restoration Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Adult With Class V Carious
NCT04716517 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Various Desensitizing Treatment Protocols
NCT07085689 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Twenty-Four-Month Clinical Comparison of Two Bulk-Fill and Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT04306549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of a Glass-ionomer Restorative System in Extended-sized Cavities
NCT02991664 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
36-Month Clinical Performance of Different Restorative Materials in the Treatment of Root Caries Lesions
NCT03722758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Investigation of Effectiveness of a Calcium Silicate Cement
NCT06256601 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Different Resin Cements
NCT04694690 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of ART Restorations Using Two Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Materials in Primary Molars
NCT06771362 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Class II Restorations
NCT06346756 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Preformed Metal Crowns Placed Using the Hall Technique Versus the Conventional Restoration
NCT04818658 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Evaluation of Direct Composite Veneer Restorations
NCT05842590 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial With Two New Tooth-colored Restorative Materials in Class I/II Cavities
NCT05748327 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Restorative Glass Ionomer and a Bulk-fill Composite Resin
NCT04685967 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
NCT04293770 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of the Effect of Deep Margin Elevation Technique on the Clinical Performance of Endocrown Restorations Produced by Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) System
NCT06222918 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA