Nanoscope System During Sacrospinofixation
NCT06177340 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 5
Last updated 2024-02-29
Summary
Sacrospinofixation is one of the reference techniques for the treatment of vaginal prolapse. It consists of fixing a non-absorbable thread on the sacrosciatic ligament unilaterally or bilaterally to correct a urogenital prolapse.
The technical difficulty is linked to the fact that the approach to the sacrosciatic ligament is palpatory without visual control. However, if the thread is not well fixed in the ligament, there is a risk of this suture coming loose and therefore of recurrence of the prolapse. On the other hand, due to the vascular and nervous proximity (pudendal nerve), vascular complications such as hemorrhage and/or hematoma have been described by vascular lesion during the passage of the needle through this ligament. Nervous complications due to pinning of the pudendal nerve or its nerve branches have also been described, which can cause after-effects of pain or even chronic dyspareunia.
Clearly and precisely visualizing the sacrosciatic ligament and the vascular and nervous structures with a microcamera could make it possible to better correct the prolapse and limit recurrences, but also to avoid these serious and disabling complications.
The Nanoscope system, which can be used in routine practice as part of sacrospinofixation, could make it possible to obtain visibility of tissues under vision control. Thus the precise visualization of the sacrospinous ligament would allow an easier approach and therefore more precise surgical procedures.
Conditions
- Sacrospinofixation
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
visualization of the sacrospinous ligament
visualization of the sacrospinous ligament by the Nanoscope system during sacrospinofixation
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospices Civils de Lyon
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 100 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-01-10
- Primary Completion
- 2024-03-31
- Completion
- 2024-04-28
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prosthetic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT01637441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Smartmesh Technology in Pelvic Floor Repair Procedures
NCT03098641 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Safety, Performance, and Tolerability of the Sacromesh® Medical Device in the Treatment of Prolapse by Promontofixation in a Population of Patients Followed Over the Long Term.
NCT06620211 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of 2 Lightweight Y-meshes After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02248935 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Sacral Colpopexy and Paravaginal Repair
NCT02258230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00551993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Native Tissues Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03875989 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using Transvaginal Mesh
NCT00402844 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Clinical Assessment of the Total Vaginal Mesh Technique for Treatment of Genital Prolapse
NCT00196495 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Posterior IVS Versus Sacrospinous Suspension in Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair
NCT00153231 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
LAparoscopic Preventive PRErectal Mesh
NCT03766048 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Mesh Versus No Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT00153257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.
NCT02272361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Vault Prolapse Surgical Treatment
NCT06792331 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
UGYTEX® Mesh Versus Subvesical Plication in the Surgical Treatment of Bladder Prolapse
NCT02255994 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Vaginal Prolapse
NCT03187574 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00566917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laparoscopic Sacropexy: Comparison of Mesh Attachment
NCT00928239 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse
NCT06720831 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Study of Outpatient Management for Promontofixation by Laparoscopy
NCT03573752 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Axis(TM) Solvent-dehydrate Dermal Allograft in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT06263985 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Restorelle® Y Mesh vs. Vertessa® Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03681223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assisted Promontofixation Using Glue Versus Promontofixation Using Threads (PROCOL)
NCT03624764 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Uphold Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Uterine-predominant Prolapse
NCT01559168 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA