Comparative Study of Mesh Versus No Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT00153257 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 162
Last updated 2019-11-21
Summary
Hypothesis / aims of study A RCT has shown that results of prolapse repair via vaginal approach could be improved when a polypropylene mesh is used as tissue support (1). However, non protected heavy-weight meshes were associated with a high rate of local complications such as vaginal erosions and dyspareunia (2). The aim of this multicentre study is to evaluate anatomical and functional results of an innovative low-weight polypropylene mesh protected by an absorbable hydrophilic film in the prolapse repair by vaginal route, in comparison by the standard anterior colporrhaphy.
Study design, materials and methods This study involves 15 centres in French Private or Public Hospital. Patients will be randomly allocated to be operated by a standard anterior colporrhaphy or by an anterior repair reinforced by a specially designed mesh: UgytexTM (Sofradim, France). Ugytex is a low-weight (38g/m²) and highly porous (average porosity: 89%, pores over 1.5mm) polypropylene monofilament mesh offering tissue ingrowth and connective differentiation for a stable and long-term support. The mesh is coated with a hydrophilic film composed of atelocollagen, polyethylene glycol and glycerol. The absorbable coating protects delicate pelvic viscera from the risk of acute inflammation during the healing's inflammatory peak. Prolapse severity will be evaluated using the POP-Q system. In order to evaluate the patient's quality of life, the validated PFDI and the PFIQ questionnaires will be used preoperatively and during follow-up (3), as well as a validated questionnaire on sexual problems. The difference on one-year cure rate should be 15% (80% for the anterior colporrhaphy and 95% for the mesh repair). Then the estimated number of patient is 97 in each arm.
Conditions
- Vaginal Prolapse
- Cystocele
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Ugytex
Anterior repair reinforced by a specially designed mesh: UgytexTM
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
DRRC
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Medtronic - MITG
collaborator INDUSTRY -
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Hervé Fernandez, MD · Hôpital Béclère, Clamart, France
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2005-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2010-12-31
- Completion
- 2013-01-31
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Uphold Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Uterine-predominant Prolapse
NCT01559168 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using Transvaginal Mesh
NCT00402844 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Flat Polypropylene Mesh in the Treatment of Uterine and Recurrent or Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06225375 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Clinical Outcomes of Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Cystocele Repair: Comparisons of Uphold and Perigee Systems
NCT03764891 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Mesh Repair of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
NCT00420225 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.
NCT02272361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LAparoscopic Preventive PRErectal Mesh
NCT03766048 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RCT for Transvaginal Self-cut Mesh vs Mesh-kit for Severe POP
NCT03849157 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Vaginal Prolapse
NCT03187574 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
NCT02231099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transobturator Repair by Vaginal Plastron
NCT05741567 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Single Incision Transvaginal Mesh in Treatment of Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
NCT02092623 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Restorelle® Y Mesh vs. Vertessa® Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03681223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
NCT00475540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.
NCT00372190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Single Versus Multicenter Outcomes for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using a Mesh-capturing Device
NCT03077490 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse
NCT00557882 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of 2 Lightweight Y-meshes After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02248935 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Vaginal Adventitia Reserved and Anatomical Implant Technique of Transvaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT05707533 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing Transvaginal Self-tailored Titanium-coated Polypropylene Mesh Procedure With Mesh-kit Procedure.
NCT03283124 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT02383199 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evolution of Symptoms After Anterior Sacrospinofixation by Autologous Tissues
NCT04270188 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Central and Anterior Compartment Prolapse Surgery: A Meshless Sacrocolpopexy Technique
NCT05558852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Biological Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Interdisciplinary RRP With SCP
NCT06245577 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior IVS Versus Sacrospinous Suspension in Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair
NCT00153231 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4