MedTrace Logo

Laparoscopic Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Sacral Colpopexy and Paravaginal Repair

NCT02258230 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 194

Last updated 2018-04-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Compare operative times and complications of sacral colpopexy and paravaginal repair between two-dimensional and three-dimensional laparoscopic systems.

Conditions

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Cystocele

Interventions

DEVICE

3D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System

Olympus 3DV-190 3D Visualization Unit. LTF-190-10-3D: ENDOEYE FLEX 3D Videoscope.

DEVICE

2D mode of the 3D Laparoscopic Video System

Olympus 3DV-190 3D Visualization Unit. LTF-190-10-3D: ENDOEYE FLEX 3D Videoscope.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • International Urogynecology Associates

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Olympus Corporation of the Americas

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Robert D Moore, DO · International Urogynecology Associates

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-12-31
Primary Completion
2018-03-31
Completion
2018-03-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02258230 on ClinicalTrials.gov