Safety Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using Transvaginal Mesh
NCT00402844 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 250
Last updated 2007-11-14
Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse is characterized by a lack of pelvic floor support causing the pelvic organs and vaginal walls to protrude. For decades, suture repair techniques have been the primary choice of surgical treatment when indicated.
The notion of reinforcing pelvic floor defects using biomaterial implants is not an exclusively contemporary idea. Traditional surgical techniques are frequently associated with unsatisfying anatomical recurrence rates and over the years sporadic attempts have been made to introduce novel surgical techniques using a variety of biomaterials as support with varying success. It is plausible that inherently weak, or damaged, pelvic floor supportive tissues need to be reinforced by a permanent support to avoid the high rates of recurrences commonly described using traditional techniques. However, use of biomaterials in pelvic reconstructive surgery has become widespread in just a few years despite a lack of clinical safety data, or compelling clinical evidence demonstrating that it improves outcomes compared to traditional suture techniques.
It is likely that biomaterials need to be "anchored" in tissues not afflicted by the disease, in order to provide the intended pelvic floor support. This has given rise to transvaginal surgical techniques using a transobturator approach passing the mesh through the arcus tendineous fascia pelvis, or the sacrospinous ligaments through a transgluteal approach. Already commercially available implant materials are in need of patient safety documentation, both when considering the surgical techniques by which these materials are placed in the body as well as the actual materials. Complication rates and perioperative morbidity using these surgical routes in pelvic organ prolapse surgery are generally unknown.
The aim of the present study was to assess the long term morbidity, and describe the complications, associated with transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse using the PROLIFT®-system.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Transvaginal mesh- PROLIFT®-system
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Karolinska University Hospital
collaborator OTHER - lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Daniel Altman, MD, PhD · Karolinska Institutet
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2006-08-31
- Completion
- 2007-03-31
Countries
- Denmark
- Finland
- Norway
- Sweden
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparing Transvaginal Self-tailored Titanium-coated Polypropylene Mesh Procedure With Mesh-kit Procedure.
NCT03283124 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT01637441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Smartmesh Technology in Pelvic Floor Repair Procedures
NCT03098641 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Flat Polypropylene Mesh in the Treatment of Uterine and Recurrent or Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06225375 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Vaginal Native Tissues Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03875989 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Performance Analysis of the Exair(TM) Prolapse Repair System in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03271294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Repair of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
NCT00420225 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
NCT00475540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single Incision Transvaginal Mesh in Treatment of Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
NCT02092623 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT02383199 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse
NCT00557882 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Native Tissue Repair in Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Long-term Results and Risk of Re-operation
NCT06744972 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pelvic Reconstruction
NCT03457883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Adventitia Reserved and Anatomical Implant Technique of Transvaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT05707533 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Vaginal Prolapse
NCT03187574 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Randomised, Controlled Study of Bimesh, Pelvicol for Vaginal Wall Prolapse
NCT00442247 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of the Total Vaginal Mesh Technique for Treatment of Genital Prolapse
NCT00196495 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The ELEGANT Trial: Elevate Transvaginal Mesh vs. Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT01497171 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Axis(TM) Solvent-dehydrate Dermal Allograft in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT06263985 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
RCT for Transvaginal Self-cut Mesh vs Mesh-kit for Severe POP
NCT03849157 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Restorelle® Mesh Versus Native Tissue Repair for Prolapse
NCT02162615 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Outcomes of Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Cystocele Repair: Comparisons of Uphold and Perigee Systems
NCT03764891 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Efficacy of a Transvaginal Suture Capturing Mesh Device
NCT01823055 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biological Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Interdisciplinary RRP With SCP
NCT06245577 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA