Comparison of 2 Lightweight Y-meshes After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02248935 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 316
Last updated 2017-06-09
Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the clinical cure rates of pelvic organ prolapse from subjects that had a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy using Alyte Y mesh and Restorelle Y smartmesh lightweight mesh.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Atlantic Health System
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-08-31
- Completion
- 2015-08-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Real-Life Use of Transabdominal Restorelle® Meshes in Apical Prolapse Repair
NCT06296316 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Flat Polypropylene Mesh in the Treatment of Uterine and Recurrent or Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06225375 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.
NCT02272361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Mesh Versus No Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT00153257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Uphold Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Uterine-predominant Prolapse
NCT01559168 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prosthetic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT01637441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpexy Versus Lateral Suspension
NCT03582852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Performance of a Pelvic Floor Mesh Implant (LatGYNious)
NCT07066761 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Biological Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Interdisciplinary RRP With SCP
NCT06245577 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evolution of Symptoms After Anterior Sacrospinofixation by Autologous Tissues
NCT04270188 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00551993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UGYTEX® Mesh Versus Subvesical Plication in the Surgical Treatment of Bladder Prolapse
NCT02255994 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Axis(TM) Solvent-dehydrate Dermal Allograft in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT06263985 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.
NCT00372190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Smartmesh Technology in Pelvic Floor Repair Procedures
NCT03098641 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Sacropexy: Comparison of Mesh Attachment
NCT00928239 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Sacral Colpopexy and Paravaginal Repair
NCT02258230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Uphold Versus Robotic Surgery for Pelvic Prolapse Repair: A Decision Analytic Approach
NCT01611285 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
NCT02231099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Anterior Pelvic Prolapse Reconstruction With TiLOOP® PRO A Polypropylene Mesh
NCT02690220 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
NCT00475540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Safety, Performance, and Tolerability of the Sacromesh® Medical Device in the Treatment of Prolapse by Promontofixation in a Population of Patients Followed Over the Long Term.
NCT06620211 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Vaginal Prolapse
NCT03187574 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Central and Anterior Compartment Prolapse Surgery: A Meshless Sacrocolpopexy Technique
NCT05558852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of a Transvaginal Suture Capturing Mesh Device
NCT01823055 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA