Assisted Promontofixation Using Glue Versus Promontofixation Using Threads (PROCOL)
NCT03624764 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90
Last updated 2021-02-09
Summary
The treatment of gynecological prolapse (organ removal) can be done by laparoscopy or vaginally. Laparoscopy is used in 1 out of 2 cases, but learning is difficult and operation time is long. One of the technical difficulties is related to the sutures to the threads. Some surgeons therefore use a glue to fix prosthetic reinforcements more easily and quickly, but this sizing technique has only been evaluated very little. Our study proposes to compare the technique of suture with the thread at the gluing of the prostheses in order to validate the merits of this new technique
Conditions
- Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparostopic promontofixation using surgical glue
The technique involves implanting a prosthetic tissue (tape) between the bladder and the vagina, suspending the cervix or the vagina affectionately, associated or not with a posterior strip placed between the rectum and the vagina fixed on the small pelvis muscles. Each strip is held by the surgical glue (cyanoacrylate biocompatible adhesive)
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparostopic promontofixation using threads
The technique involves implanting a prosthetic tissue (tape) between the bladder and the vagina, suspending the cervix or the vagina affectionately, associated or not with a posterior strip placed between the rectum and the vagina fixed on the small pelvis muscles. Each strip is held by sutures with threads
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Clinique Beau Soleil
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Christophe Courtieu · Clinqieu Beau Soleil
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-01-04
- Primary Completion
- 2019-10-04
- Completion
- 2020-01-04
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Vaginal Prolapse
NCT03187574 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
National,Multicentric Randomised Study of the Correction of Genital Prolapse With Fascial Repair or Mesh-Prolift
NCT00771225 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Transobturator Repair by Vaginal Plastron
NCT05741567 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT05420831 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment To Greater Anterior Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00676325 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00566917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair.
NCT05422209 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Multicenter Study on the Correction of Prolapse Via Laparoscopy
NCT06815731 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evolution of Symptoms After Anterior Sacrospinofixation by Autologous Tissues
NCT04270188 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study of Outpatient Management for Promontofixation by Laparoscopy
NCT03573752 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse
NCT06720831 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.
NCT00372190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpexy Versus Lateral Suspension
NCT03582852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Repair of Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
NCT00420225 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparative Study of Mesh Versus No Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT00153257 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UGYTEX® Mesh Versus Subvesical Plication in the Surgical Treatment of Bladder Prolapse
NCT02255994 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT02383199 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Avaulta Versus Anterior Repair
NCT00627549 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pelvic Reconstruction
NCT03457883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Native Tissues Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03875989 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Biological Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Interdisciplinary RRP With SCP
NCT06245577 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00551993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flat Polypropylene Mesh in the Treatment of Uterine and Recurrent or Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06225375 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Real-Life Use of Transabdominal Restorelle® Meshes in Apical Prolapse Repair
NCT06296316 ·Status: TERMINATED