Laparoscopic Sacrocolpexy Versus Lateral Suspension
NCT03582852 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 7
Last updated 2022-08-09
Summary
Surgical treatment of genital prolapse can be performed by laparoscopic surgery or by vaginal surgery, with or without using meshes. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, which consist in fixing a mesh between vaginal anterior wall and the promontory is the gold standard procedure to treat anterior prolapse or of the vaginal vault. Most of studies shows a success rate of 80% of this procedure.
However, access to the promontory could be difficult in patients because of adherences or anatomical reasons. This step of the procedure also exposes to risk of ureteral or vascular injuries. Recent issues have also found spondylodiscitis cases.
The technique of laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh was developed by Dubuisson in 1998 allows not to have to approach the promontory and avoids both the risk of vascular injury and ureteral damage of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Instead of attach the mesh to the promontory, the procedure consists in spreading out bilaterally, a subperitoneal T-shaped mesh in the anterior abdominal wall. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and functional efficiency of the lateral suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
It is a prospective, randomized, monocentric study compared two groups The study hypothesis is that the lateral suspension would provide correction than the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
The primary outcome is the comparison of anatomic correction rates at 1 year Success is defined as 1 year Ba et C points \< -1 centimeter in POP-Q international score.
Secondary endpoints are improve of quality of life evaluated with the validated P-QOL questionnaire, and complications rates, including post-operative posterior prolapse.
Number of subjects required is 72 patients, 36 in each group having a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or lateral suspension.
Outcomes will be evaluated at 1 month and 1 year post-operative consultation
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Surgical treatment of genital prolapse
Laparoscopy performed according to the usual technique of the participating center with pneumoperitoneum between 12 and 15 mmHg. Placement of the 5 mm trocar operator left and right iliac fossa and 5 mm pubic addition.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Jean-Olivier ARNAUD, Director · Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-04-11
- Primary Completion
- 2021-04-20
- Completion
- 2021-04-20
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prosthetic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT01637441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.
NCT02272361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00566917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00551993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse
NCT00557882 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laparoscopic Sacropexy: Comparison of Mesh Attachment
NCT00928239 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.
NCT00372190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
National,Multicentric Randomised Study of the Correction of Genital Prolapse With Fascial Repair or Mesh-Prolift
NCT00771225 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of 2 Lightweight Y-meshes After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02248935 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse
NCT06720831 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evolution of Symptoms After Anterior Sacrospinofixation by Autologous Tissues
NCT04270188 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The ELEGANT Trial: Elevate Transvaginal Mesh vs. Anterior Colporrhaphy
NCT01497171 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparing Transvaginal Self-tailored Titanium-coated Polypropylene Mesh Procedure With Mesh-kit Procedure.
NCT03283124 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Outpatient Management for Promontofixation by Laparoscopy
NCT03573752 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
NCT02231099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
NCT00475540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Acellular Collagen Biomesh (Pelvisoft) to Polypropylene Mesh(Pelvitex) for Sacral Colpopexy
NCT00564083 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial to Determine Which of Two Surgical Techniques Works Better to Correct Vaginal Bulging
NCT00988975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intra-operative Adverse Events During Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy
NCT02870192 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Using Vascularized Vaginal Flap on the Efficacy of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT06494982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior IVS Versus Sacrospinous Suspension in Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair
NCT00153231 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT05420831 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Native Tissues Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03875989 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restorelle® Y Mesh vs. Vertessa® Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03681223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair.
NCT05422209 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA