Laparoscopic Sacropexy: Comparison of Mesh Attachment
NCT00928239 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 88
Last updated 2009-06-25
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative complications and outcome two different attachment sites of the dorsal mesh support in laparoscopic sacropexy.
Conditions
- Vaginal Vault Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
laparoscopic sacropexy with mid vaginal attachment
* supracervical hysterectomy for uterine prolapse * exposure of the anterior longitudinal ligament of sacrum and recto-vaginal septum posterior * dissection up to ventrolateral part of the levator ani muscle * Anterior dissection of vesico-vaginal fascia up to the lower third of the vagina below the trigonum of bladder * Two separate meshes, Gynemesh® (Johnson\&Johnson) a polypropylene mesh, for anterior and posterior compartment * suturing of posterior mesh caudally to levator ani muscle and proximally 4cm from the apex of the vagina or cervical stump * placement of anterior mesh underneath bladder and attachment to caudal part of the vagina and the apex * suturing together anterior and posterior mesh are sutured together at level of vaginal apex and attachment to longitudinal sacral ligament at level of S2
- PROCEDURE
-
laparoscopic sacropexy with caudal vaginal attachment
* supracervical hysterectomy for uterine prolapse * exposure of the anterior longitudinal ligament of sacrum and recto-vaginal septum posterior * dissection up to ventrolateral part of the levator ani muscle * Anterior dissection of vesico-vaginal fascia up to the lower third of the vagina below the trigonum of bladder * Two separate meshes, Gynemesh® (Johnson\&Johnson) a polypropylene mesh, for anterior and posterior compartment * suturing of posterior mesh caudally to the levator ani muscle and proximally at caudal part of the vagina or cervical stump * placement of anterior mesh underneath bladder and attachment to caudal part of the vagina and the apex * suturing together anterior and posterior mesh are sutured together at level of vaginal apex and attachment to longitudinal sacral ligament at level of S2
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Kantonsspital Aarau
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Dimitri Sarlos, MD · Kantonsspital Aarau, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-06-30
- Primary Completion
- 2011-06-30
- Completion
- 2014-06-30
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.
NCT02272361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT05420831 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Central and Anterior Compartment Prolapse Surgery: A Meshless Sacrocolpopexy Technique
NCT05558852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Restorelle® Y Mesh vs. Vertessa® Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT03681223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intra-operative Adverse Events During Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy
NCT02870192 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Vault Prolapse Surgical Treatment
NCT06792331 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sacro-hysteropexy Using Proline Mesh Versus Mersilene Tape in Apical Prolapse
NCT05196542 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00551993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Safety, Performance, and Tolerability of the Sacromesh® Medical Device in the Treatment of Prolapse by Promontofixation in a Population of Patients Followed Over the Long Term.
NCT06620211 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Influence of Using Vascularized Vaginal Flap on the Efficacy of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT06494982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
NCT02231099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of V-NOTES and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy Techniques
NCT07082023 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Titanium vs Absorbable Tacks for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair
NCT02076984 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes
NCT02536001 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.
NCT00372190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment
NCT04878146 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Sacral Colpopexy and Paravaginal Repair
NCT02258230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vaginal Axis on MRI in Alternative Apical Prolapse Surgeries to Sacrocolpopexy
NCT06072456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width
NCT03429374 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Antibiotic Treatment for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair: Necessary or Not?
NCT02083939 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Single Incision Transvaginal Mesh in Treatment of Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse
NCT02092623 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Sacropolpopexy
NCT04332315 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
NCT00475540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse
NCT00557882 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Real-Life Use of Transabdominal Restorelle® Meshes in Apical Prolapse Repair
NCT06296316 ·Status: TERMINATED