Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Versus Percutaneous Nephrolothotomy for Management of >3cm Renal Pelvis Stone

NCT01637337 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2016-04-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the outcome of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with \>3cm renal pelvis stone.

Conditions

  • Renal Pelvis Stone >3cm

Interventions

PROCEDURE

laparoscopic pyelolithotomy

laparoscopy

PROCEDURE

percutaneous nephrolithotomy

percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-05-31
Primary Completion
2012-12-31
Completion
2013-01-31

Countries

  • Iran

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01637337 on ClinicalTrials.gov