Ischia Spinous Fascia Fixation Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage III
NCT01670682 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2012-08-22
Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem. The primary treatment is surgery. Ischia spinous fascia fixation procedure and modified total pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh are both developed in China for vaginal apex fixation, the former is native tissue repairs, and the latter is augmentation with mesh.
This study is designed to determine the effectiveness and safety of ischia spinous fascia fixation procedure compared with modified total pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse stage III.
Patients enrolled into the study will be followed up for up to 3 years after surgery. Evaluation will take place during surgery and postoperative visit. Stage of prolapse before and after surgery, patient satisfaction through quality of life and sexual function questionnaires before and after surgery, and peri-operative complication rates will be evaluated.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
ischia spinous fascia fixation
Subjects of this group were submitted to surgical treatment with ischia spinous fascia fixation.
- PROCEDURE
-
Modified Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery with Mesh
Subjects of this group were submitted to surgical treatment with Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery with Mesh.
- DEVICE
-
polypropylene mesh(Gynemesh)
Pelvic floor reconstruction will be conducted using surgical mesh made from polypropylene.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 55 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-08-31
- Completion
- 2016-08-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Long-term Success Rate of Transvaginal Mesh for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: The Extended RCT Study
NCT05938881 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pelvic Reconstruction
NCT03457883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Native Tissue Repair in Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Long-term Results and Risk of Re-operation
NCT06744972 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Influence of Using Vascularized Vaginal Flap on the Efficacy of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT06494982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
NCT00475540 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flat Polypropylene Mesh in the Treatment of Uterine and Recurrent or Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06225375 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.
NCT00372190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse
NCT06720831 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair.
NCT05422209 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of the Total Vaginal Mesh Technique for Treatment of Genital Prolapse
NCT00196495 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Study on the Anti-incontinent Effectiveness of the mTVM Method in POPQ Stage II-III Patients
NCT02935803 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Splentis for the Treatment of Primary Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT05042453 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Safety Study of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using Transvaginal Mesh
NCT00402844 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of the Effects of Sacrospinous Fixation and V-notes Lateral Suspension Operations
NCT06307873 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Transvaginal Mesh Procedures for Cystocele Repair: Comparisons of Uphold and Perigee Systems
NCT03764891 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Axis(TM) Solvent-dehydrate Dermal Allograft in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT06263985 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse
NCT00557882 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Smartmesh Technology in Pelvic Floor Repair Procedures
NCT03098641 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness Prolift+M Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
NCT02231099 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of V-NOTES and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy Techniques
NCT07082023 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vaginal Axis on MRI in Alternative Apical Prolapse Surgeries to Sacrocolpopexy
NCT06072456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Treatment To Greater Anterior Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00676325 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00566917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Results of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair With One Versus Two Vaginal Meshes
NCT02536001 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA