Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Sacropolpopexy
NCT04332315 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 87
Last updated 2020-04-02
Summary
Introduction and Hypothesis: Vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VALS), which is a combined surgical approach where a vaginal hysterectomy is initially performed, followed by transvaginal placement of synthetic mesh and laparoscopic suspension, can be an alternative to overcome the dissection, suturing limitations of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The aim of this study was to compare the middle term anatomic outcomes, complication rates, and operative times of patients with uterovaginal prolapse undergoing VALS with those of women undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Methods: This is a prospective cohort study that evaluates operation times, anesthesia times, estimated blood loss, middle term outcomes, perioperative and postoperative complications. We compared the results of 47 women who had the VALS to that of 32 abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy
The VALS procedure consists of two steps. First, vaginal hysterectomy or laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy performed, anterior vaginal wall dissected up to bladder neck starting from initial vaginal incision, posterior vaginal wall dissected from rectum starting from initial vaginal incision up to distal third of posterior vaginal wall.The free arms of fixed meshes are introduced to the peritoneal cavity and the vaginal vault is closed with absorbable polyglactin suture. laparoscopy phase was performed with one intraumbilical (10 mm), 3 lateral abdominal (5 mm) trocars. Two mesh strips fixated to anterior longitudinal ligament of the sacrum with two separate no: 1 polypropylene sutures without tension. AS was performed via Pfannenstiel incision after total or subtotal abdominal hysterectomy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Bezmialem Vakif University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2015-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-02-01
- Completion
- 2020-03-30
More Related Trials
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment
NCT04878146 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Vaginal Axis on MRI in Alternative Apical Prolapse Surgeries to Sacrocolpopexy
NCT06072456 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of V-NOTES and Laparoscopic Mesh-Free Sacrocolpopexy Techniques
NCT07082023 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse
NCT06720831 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Prosthetic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT01637441 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Using Vascularized Vaginal Flap on the Efficacy of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT06494982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Transvaginal Mesh and Traditional Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT00566917 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Posterior IVS Versus Sacrospinous Suspension in Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair
NCT00153231 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sacrocolpopexy Versus Vaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Prolapse
NCT01097200 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Influence of Simultaneous Posterior Colporrhaphy and Perineoplasty on the Efficiency and Safety of Mesh-augmented Sacrospinal Fixation (Apical Sling) in Advanced POP Repair.
NCT05422209 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpexy Versus Lateral Suspension
NCT03582852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Use of Synthetic Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT06872983 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Adventitia Reserved and Anatomical Implant Technique of Transvaginal Mesh Procedure for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT05707533 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
VNOTES Approach in Mesh Free Sacrocolpopexy: A Functional and Anatomic Evaluation
NCT07114029 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
LAparoscopic Preventive PRErectal Mesh
NCT03766048 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacropexy: Comparison of Mesh Attachment
NCT00928239 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effects of Sacrospinous Fixation and V-notes Lateral Suspension Operations
NCT06307873 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polypropylene Mesh in Prolapse Surgery
NCT02383199 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Surgical Treatment To Greater Anterior Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00676325 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Biological Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Interdisciplinary RRP With SCP
NCT06245577 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Vaginal Prolapse
NCT00551993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study of Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy Using Alyte Mesh
NCT01320644 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Performance of Tension Free Vaginal Mesh (Prolift) Versus Conventional Vaginal Prolapse Surgery in Recurrent Prolapse.
NCT00372190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Native Tissue Repair in Pelvic Organ Prolapse -Long-term Results and Risk of Re-operation
NCT06744972 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Vaginal Native Tissues Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03875989 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA