MedTrace Logo

Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques Used for Maxillary Hybrid Prosthesis

NCT05321589 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 12

Last updated 2022-04-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

evaluation and comparison of the accuracy of conventional and digital impression for full arch screw retained prosthesis for edentulous maxilla.

Conditions

  • Prosthesis Durability

Interventions

OTHER

impression techniques for implant used for maxillary screw retained hybrid prosthesis

conventional splinted open tray impression technique was done for maxillary implants to fabricate screw retained hybrid prosthesis and digital intra oral impression was done for the same patients after screwing scan bodies to the implants intra orally. evaluation of accuracy and 3D deviation between the two techniques was done

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-03-01
Primary Completion
2022-02-20
Completion
2022-03-20

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05321589 on ClinicalTrials.gov