Periodontal and Orthodontic Outcomes of Straight vs. Looped Fixed Retainers
NCT05644119 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2022-12-09
Summary
The goal of this split-mouth, head-to-head, randomized controlled trial is to compare the effects of a fixed straight retainer with the V- loop bonded retainer on periodontal health in patients with the requirement of continuous fixed retention for 12-24 months after orthodontic treatment.
The main question it aims to answer is whether the V- loop bonded retainer is more effective than fixed straight retainer for periodontal health management.
Each patient will receive 2 lower fixed and bonded retainers: (1) a straight wire retainer (SWR) and (2) a looped wire retainer (LWR). Patients will be asked to floss once daily with a thread flosser.
Researchers will compare the effects of two types of retainers to see if there is a statistically significant difference.
Conditions
- Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- Orthodontic Appliance Design
- Orthodontic Treatment
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
V- loop Bonded Orthodontic Retainer
The V- loop bonded retainer is a unique design that not just provides tooth stability but also allows flossing with ease.
- DEVICE
-
Straight Wire Retainer
The straight wire retainer is a fixed bonded orthodontic retainer. This involves attaching a metal wire to the back of the teeth to keep it in position.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
King Abdulaziz University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Talal Zahid, M.S · Associate Professor, King Abdulaziz University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 12 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-06-30
- Completion
- 2023-10-31
Countries
- Saudi Arabia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
RCT for the Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT02742493 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Effectiveness of Bonded Versus Vacuum-formed Retainers
NCT04847323 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Fixed Mandibular Retainer Using 3D Printed Positioning Tray Versus Direct Bonding Technique
NCT03572179 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Maxillary Anterior Teeth After Two Years of Retention in Adolescents Comparing Two Bonded and a Vacuum-formed Retainer
NCT04616755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
NCT06502886 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers
NCT06476574 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT03070444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Eight Units Extended Maxillary Fixed Retainer
NCT05889884 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Removable Retainers
NCT05854953 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Fixed Lingual Retainers on Tooth Stability
NCT06284499 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Retention With Three Different Bonded Retainers a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial With 5-year Follow-up
NCT04828096 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
"Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 7 Days) Retainer Delivery
NCT05612932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Modified Vacuum-formed Retainers Versus Hawley Retainer
NCT04237298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Orthodontic Retention Protocols
NCT05121220 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Two Types of Fixed Lingual Retainers in Preventing Mandibular Incisor Relapse
NCT03881813 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
NCT05968625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Gold Fixed Retainers Compared to Conventional Stainless Steel Retainers
NCT07280455 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Types of Lingual Fixed Retainer Fabricated
NCT06244810 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Two Protocol for Maxillary Molar Intrusion Buccal Miniscrew and TPA Versus Vertical Holding Appliance
NCT05433051 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Longevity of Prefabricated Band and Loop Versus Conventional Band and Loop Space Maintainers
NCT06573463 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Assessment of Failure Rate of Fixed Lingual Retainer Between Two Types of Light Cured Resin Composite
NCT05660668 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Mandibular Fixed Retainers.
NCT06529601 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Of Oral Health-Related Quality Of Life In Patients Wearing Vacuum Formed Thermoplastic Retainers Constructed On Conventional Stone Models And On 3D Reconstructed Orthodontic Study Model
NCT02866617 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Retention Characteristics of Immediate vs Delayed Retainer Delivery Using 3D Digital Model Analysis
NCT06292364 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bond Failure with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Visible Light-cure Composite Bonding Material in Adult Orthodontic Patients - a Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06602154 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA