Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT03070444 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 104
Last updated 2022-08-09
Summary
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate and compare stability after orthodontic treatment with an Essix retainer and a bonded cuspid-to-cuspid retainer (CTC), respectively in the mandibular arch and longitudinally follow these patients over time up to 5 years. The patients' perceptions of the two methods are also evaluated with questionnaires during the follow-up period.
A further aim of this study is to analyze the relationship between diagnosis, treatment outcome, treatment time, age at start of treatment and stability with an Essix retainer in the maxilla.
The null hypotheses are:
* that there is no difference in retention capacity between Essix retainer and cuspid-to-cuspid retainer
* that there is no difference in patients' perception between Essix retainer and cuspid-to-cuspid retainer
* that there is no difference in retention capacity for Essix retainer in the maxilla concerning diagnosis before treatment, treatment outcomes, treatment time and age at start of treatment
Conditions
- Orthodontics
- Retention
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
CTC retainer
The CTC retainer consists of 0.8 hard Remanium® wire (Dentaurum, Germany) and is bonded with Tetric Flow (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) to the lower canines directly after debonding.
- DEVICE
-
Essix retainer maxilla
The Essix retainer is made of 1 mm Essix C+® Plastic (Dentsply, USA) and is handed out to the patient the same day after removal of fixed appliances.
- DEVICE
-
Essix retainer mandible
The Essix retainer is made of 1 mm Essix C+® Plastic (Dentsply, USA) and is handed out to the patient the same day after removal of fixed appliances.
- PROCEDURE
-
Alginate impression
Alginate impressions are taken to made the cuspid-to-cuspid and Essix retainers, respectively. Dental casts are obtained at the debond appointment and at the follow-up visits after 6, 18 and 60 months.
- OTHER
-
Questionnaire
A questionnaire is completed at the follow-up visits.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Umeå University
collaborator OTHER -
Region Gävleborg
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Anke Krämer, DDS · Folktandvården Gävleborg AB, Specialisttandvården ortdonti
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-11-12
- Primary Completion
- 2021-01-14
- Completion
- 2021-06-18
More Related Trials
-
RCT for the Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT02742493 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Different Storage Conditions on Removable Retainers
NCT05854953 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retentive Capacity of Bonded Retainer Vs Vacuum-formed and Combined Bonded-vacuum Retainers
NCT06476574 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Modified Vacuum-formed Retainers Versus Hawley Retainer
NCT04237298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Different Thickness of Vacuum Formed Retainer (Essix Retainer) During Retention Phase After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT04149366 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Assessment of Bacterial Loads of Essix Retainers in Patients Under Retention Therapy
NCT04871763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Periodontal Health, Bonding Time and Failure Between Direct and Indirect Fixed Retainer Placement Among Orthodontic Patients
NCT07107100 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Efficiency and Effectiveness of Two Types of Bonded Orthodontic Retainers: an RCT.
NCT05250765 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Perforated 3D Printed Versus Conventional Metal Fixed Bonded Retainer
NCT06851897 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
NCT06502886 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Fixed Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT05926934 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
NCT05968625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Colonisation On Vacuum-Formed Retainers Constructed On Conventional Models And Three Dimensional (3D) Reconstructed Models
NCT03844425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Fixed Mandibular Retainer Using 3D Printed Positioning Tray Versus Direct Bonding Technique
NCT03572179 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Two Types of Fixed Lingual Retainers in Preventing Mandibular Incisor Relapse
NCT03881813 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CAD/CAM Fixed Retainers vs. Conventional Multistranded Fixed Retainers in Orthodontic Patients. Comparison of Stability, Retainer Failure Rate, Adverse Effects, Cost-effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT04389879 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Remineralizing Agents on White Spot Lesions and Dental Plaque During Orthodontic Retention
NCT04788550 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 7 Days) Retainer Delivery
NCT05612932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Ligation Methods During Canine Retraction Stage Using Conventional Brackets
NCT07063186 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Retention Characteristics of Immediate vs Delayed Retainer Delivery Using 3D Digital Model Analysis
NCT06292364 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Salivary Bisphenol-A Levels in Patients With Fixed Lingual, Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers
NCT05738889 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effects of Class III Elastics on Stability of Orthopaedic Class III Correction
NCT04911400 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Split-Mouth Clinical Trial Evaluating the Bond Failure Rate of a New Etch-Free Orthodontic Adhesive
NCT07091422 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
: "Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 3 Days) Retainer Delivery
NCT05879588 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Commercial Available Tooth Positioner for the Treatment of Simple Orthodontic Relapse
NCT03332082 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA