Comparison Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Mandibular Fixed Retainers.
NCT06529601 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 54
Last updated 2024-07-31
Summary
The devices compared in this study are 'retainers', i.e. fixed orthodontic retainers applied to the lingual surface of the central and lateral incisors and lower canines bilaterally. Their function is to maintain dental alignment once fixed orthodontic therapy has ended. In particular, the CAD/CAM device Keeppy patented by the company Leone SpA (Via Ponte a Quaracchi 50, Sesto Fiorentino, Florence) will be compared with the standard retainer made from a steel braided wire (Ortho FlexTech, Reliance Orthodontic Products Inc., 1540 West Thorndale Ave, Itasca, Illinois, USA).
This is a single-center, national, controlled, superiority, randomized, crossover, open-label study.
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the CAD/CAM retainer results in fewer failures (fractures or detachments) over a period of 6 months and 2 years compared to the standard retainer. In addition, the aim of the study is to evaluate whether the Keeppy device results in the maintenance of better periodontal health as judged by the use of plaque and bleeding indices on the surfaces of the lower six anterior teeth compared to the standard retainer. Other objectives consist of the patient's assessment of pain, difficulty in speaking and esthetic satisfaction and the stability of the lower anterior tooth sector.
Conditions
- Orthodontic Retainers
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
CAD/CAM mandibular fixed retainer
Keeppy is a Class IIa custom-made medical device manufactured by Digital Service Leone s.r.l. - via Pratese 160/b, Florence, Italy. The Keeppy is an individualized fixed retainer, made of a Nickel-free Chrome Cobalt alloy, produced with a CAD-CAM procedure starting from a digital impression made with an intraoral optical scanner (3 Shape), which allows a perfect adaptation to the lingual surfaces of the 6 lower anterior teeth on which it is bonded. The device is characterized by the presence of applicators that can be placed temporarily on the buccal surface of the canines, which facilitate the clinician in the precise application of the device and which are removed as soon as the bonding phase of the retainer is complete. Bonding is performed using classic composite resins following a preparation phase of the lingual surface of the tooth consisting of the application of etchant (37% orthophosphoric acid) for 30 seconds and adhesive (primer-bonding).
- DEVICE
-
Conventional mandibular fixed retainer
The standard control device, which is among the most commonly used in routine clinical practice, consists of a steel braided wire. The device selected for the Class IIa investigation is the Ortho Flex Tech manufactured by Reliance Orthodontic Products, Inc. 1540 West Thorndale Ave. Itasca, IL 60143 USA. The Ortho Flex Tech steel braided wire is manually shaped by the clinician and cut with a wire cutter so that it has the proper length to extend over the 6 dental elements. Once the correct length has been defined, it is then held in place on the lingual surface of the teeth by the use of 2 interdental wires passing doubly through the interdental area (between the lateral incisor and canine on one side and the other). This allows the device to be bonded using composite resin after etching the lingual surfaces of the lower anterior teeth.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 13 Years
- Max Age
- 20 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-09-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-02-01
- Completion
- 2027-09-01
More Related Trials
-
The Effect of Different Force Magnitudes on Maxillary Posterior Segment Intrusion
NCT02901678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
NCT05968625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Morphological Changes of Removable Orthodontic Retainers During the Use
NCT06283823 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Customized and Standard Facemasks for Early Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT06402656 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three Dimensional Movement Analysis of Maxillary Impacted Canine: a Randomized Clincial Trial
NCT01717417 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
"Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 7 Days) Retainer Delivery
NCT05612932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular Sequential Distalization Versus Class III Elastics With Clear Aligners in Class III Patients
NCT06859606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Retention Characteristics of Immediate vs Delayed Retainer Delivery Using 3D Digital Model Analysis
NCT06292364 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Treatment in Adolescents With Crowding and Displaced Teeth
NCT05664282 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Maxillary Anterior Teeth After Two Years of Retention in Adolescents Comparing Two Bonded and a Vacuum-formed Retainer
NCT04616755 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
NCT06502886 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RCT for the Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT02742493 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Quantification of the Differences in the Diagnostic Relationships Between Centric Occlusion Versus Maximum Intercuspation in Adult Orthodontic Patients : A Cross-sectional Study
NCT06220955 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lower-Clear-Plate-Based Intermaxillary Traction
NCT06596239 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of Double-slot Brackets Versus Single-slot Brackets on the Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT06481761 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Types of Lingual Fixed Retainer Fabricated
NCT06244810 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CAD/CAM Fixed Retainers vs. Conventional Multistranded Fixed Retainers in Orthodontic Patients. Comparison of Stability, Retainer Failure Rate, Adverse Effects, Cost-effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT04389879 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
AMOUNT OF INTRAORAL OCCLUSAL ADJUSTMENTS IN OCCLUSAL SPLINTS FABRICATED USING FULLY DIGITAL VERSUS COMBINED DIGITAL WORKFLOW IN TMD PATIENTS
NCT06752200 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
"Comparative Evaluation of 3 Dimensional Changes of Dentition in Post Orthodontic Patients With Immediate vs Delayed (Post 24 Hours) Retainer Delivery
NCT05879601 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compliance After Orthodontic Treatment Using Thermoplastic or Hawley Retainers
NCT03683862 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Effectiveness of Cobalt Chromium CAD-CAM Designed Customized Lingual Retainer
NCT06837168 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Fixed Lingual Retainers on Tooth Stability
NCT06284499 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Retention With Three Different Bonded Retainers a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial With 5-year Follow-up
NCT04828096 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Evaluation of Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Orthodontic Treatment of Lower Anterior Crowding
NCT06510569 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Canine Retraction Using Different Reactivation Intervals
NCT04905004 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA