Comparison of Bond Failure with Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Visible Light-cure Composite Bonding Material in Adult Orthodontic Patients - a Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06602154 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 37
Last updated 2024-09-19
Summary
In this split mouth study design, 34 orthodontic patients coming for fixed appliance treatment will be bonded with standard light-cure composite bonding material and intervention of Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (RMGIC). Contralateral quadrants will be allocated randomly for either RMGIC or visible light-cure composite bonding in both upper and lower jaw.
Quadrant 1: Randomly selected, contralateral upper and lower quadrants from central incisor to second premolar will be bonded with RMGIC bonding system.
Quadrant 2: Randomly selected, contralateral quadrants from central incisor to second premolar will be bonded with visible light-cure composite bonding material.
Allocation of diagonally opposite quadrants by either bonding system will be assigned randomly. Quadrants to be bonded with Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and light-cure composite bonding material will be switched from patient to patient to ensure randomization. This study is single blinded. The study investigators will not be blinded while the patient will be kept blinded.
On the first visit, a specially designed consent form will be signed by the participant.
Patient interaction for the purpose of study will only be for 1 hour duration while bonding of brackets. After six months amount and location of bond breakages will be evaluated from orthodontic record files.
This study will help us evaluate bond strength of RMGIC as compared to light cure composite. RMGIC can also be considered as the choice of material for bonding in high risk caries patients.
Conditions
- Orthodontics
- Bracket Bonding
- Malocclusion; Displaced or Missing Teeth
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Resin modified glass ionomer
The product will be stored by investigators at room temperature in lock and key. Product: Riva light cure RMGIC (HV) Composition: 18 mg orthodontic bonding paste and 6 ml enamel bond resin. Storage: Stored at room temperature and protected from humidity. Usage: Steps for Resin-modified glass ionomer cement composite bonding: 1. Prepare all teeth with oil-free pumice, and rinse thoroughly for 15 seconds with water. 2. Wash thoroughly. 3. Etch enamel surface with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. 4. Rinse the etched surface for 20 seconds to remove the acid and precipitates that might have formed during the etching procedure. 5. Activate the capsule and immediately mix in an amalgamator. Do not click with applicator before you mix. 6. Immediately place into capsule applicator and click trigger until paste is seen through the nozzle 7. Light cure each increment for 20 seconds.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 12 Years
- Max Age
- 35 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-02-20
- Completion
- 2022-02-20
Countries
- Pakistan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Effects of Using Water Flosser Versus Interdental Brush on Gingival Health in Patients With Mandibular Bonded Retainer
NCT07054203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Precision in Brackets Position in Two Indirect Bonding Materials
NCT05483114 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Is a Primer Needed for Orthodontic Bonding? A Multi-centre Trial
NCT01782521 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Augmented Reality-Assisted Bonding Versus Digitally-Assisted Indirect Bonding in Orthodontic Patients
NCT04658446 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Tooth Discoloration and Chairside Handling Time (Bonding-Debonding) in Flowable Versus Packable Composites for Clear Aligner Bonded Attachments: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07234149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Indirect Bonding Accuracy of 3D Printed Digital Transfer Trays
NCT06167278 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Methods of Controlling Pain During Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets
NCT05104190 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of a "Flash-free" Adhesive Resin for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding
NCT02030002 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
NCT06502886 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
EFFICACY OF TRANSMUCOSAL MINIPLEITE STABILIZATION TECHNIQUE VERSUS INTRA-ARCH WIRE STABILIZATION TECHNIQUE FOR FIXATION OF SAGITTAL & PARA-SAGITTAL TYPES OF PALATAL FRACTURES IN TERMS OF INTRA-ARCH MOLAR DISTANCE & MAXILLO-MANDIBULAR MOLAR RELATION
NCT07274319 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
NCT03070444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Investigation of the Transfer Accuracy of Semi-Digital and Fully Digital Indirect Bonding Trays
NCT07318857 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Periodontal Status After the Treatment of Palatally Impacted Canines Using Acceleration Procedures
NCT05644678 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Alignment Achieved Using Computer-guided Indirect Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets to Conventional Appliance Placement
NCT02221856 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Split-Mouth Clinical Trial Evaluating the Bond Failure Rate of a New Etch-Free Orthodontic Adhesive
NCT07091422 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Rigid Versus Non-rigid Indirect Anchorage During Canine Retraction: A Split Mouth Randomized Study
NCT06554769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Bonding vs. Direct Bonding Study
NCT06266130 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Gingival Cleft Development at Two Time Points of Canine Retraction
NCT07210762 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RCT for the Effectiveness of 3 Orthodontic Retention Schemes on Post-treatment Stability and Gingival Recession
NCT02742493 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Assessment of Failure Rate of Fixed Lingual Retainer Between Two Types of Light Cured Resin Composite
NCT05660668 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Self-ligating Mico One and Conventional MBT Brackets Regarding Alignment Efficiency and Pain Experience- a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06895083 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Preliminary Application of Socket-shield Technique in Orthodontic Extraction and Fixed Orthodontic Treatment
NCT06510621 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Micro-abrasive Blasting vs Acid Etching of Orthodontic Bracket Bases
NCT04456114 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Outcome of Safe T Separators and Conventional Elastomeric Separators
NCT07119814 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Treatment Effects of Tooth Borne Versus Bone-anchored Protraction Procedures in Class III Patients With Maxillary Deficiency
NCT04863404 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA