MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Two Types of Lingual Fixed Retainer Fabricated

NCT06244810 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 42

Last updated 2025-03-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study includes patients who have had previous orthodontic treatments (without tooth extraction) and who have good alignment of their lower incisors. Investigators will compare two types of lingual retainers made with CAD-CAM

Conditions

  • Malocclusion, Angle's Class

Interventions

DEVICE

Lingual retainer from Fiber

lingual retainer manufactured from fiber using CAD-CAM technique applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.

DEVICE

Lingual retainer from metal

lingual retainer manufactured from metal using CAD-CAM technique applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.

DEVICE

Traditional retianer from braided

lingual retainer manufactured using traditional technique from stainless steel applied to the lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisors and evaluated every month over a period of 6 months.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hama University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Manar A Warrar, MSc · Hama University-Syrian Arab Republic

  • Rabab Alsabbagh, Professor · Professor of Orthodontics, University of Hama Dental School, Hama, Syria.

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
14 Years
Max Age
24 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-02-15
Primary Completion
2025-03-09
Completion
2025-03-10

Countries

  • Syria

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06244810 on ClinicalTrials.gov