MedTrace Logo

Comparative Assessment of Failure Rate of Fixed Lingual Retainer Between Two Types of Light Cured Resin Composite

NCT05660668 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90

Last updated 2023-01-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The study will be performed on human subjects with finished orthodontic treatment to see the failure rate(detachment) of fixed lingual retainer between two types of light cure resin composite

Conditions

  • Orthodontic Retainer

Interventions

OTHER

Transbond LR

cleaning the lingual surface using oil free pumice then apply acid etch 35% phosphoric acid for 20 second then rinse then Transbond LR will be applied directly on the fixed retainer and lingual surface of the teeth then light cured.

OTHER

Transbond XT

cleaning the lingual surface using oil free pumice then apply acid etch 35% phosphoric acid for 20 second then rinse then Transbond XT will be applied directly on the fixed retainer and lingual surface of the teeth then light cured.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Fady Hussein, Assoc. prof · Cairo unversity

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-11-01
Primary Completion
2023-08-01
Completion
2023-08-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05660668 on ClinicalTrials.gov