Three Dimensional Versus Standard Miniplate In Fixation Of Mandibular Angle Fracture- A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT01939015 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2013-12-30
Summary
* The aim of this study is to compare the standard and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fractures regarding to wound dehiscence, infection, nonunion, pain, hypoesthesia, and malocclusion. and to analyze advantages and disadvantages of one method over the other.
* Radiographic follow-up (in the form of posteroanterior and panoramic radiographs) will used to evaluate the patients immediately and 2 and 4 months postoperatively. Patients returned 7 days after surgery for clinical evaluation . The patients will be examined radiographically for accuracy of the reduction, screw positioning, adverse reactions in the vicinity of screw placement, and bone healing. the complications encountered will be recorded and treated. The clinical evaluations will be performed by 1 surgeon at each institution.
* The patients will also evaluated clinically for infection, nonunion, pain, hypoesthesia, and malocclusion. Malocclusion will assessed based on patient complaints. Criteria for infection will based on either of the following conditions: 1) purulent discharge from an incision and 2) serosanguineous drainage and a wound culture positive for a known pathogen. All the patients will evaluated postoperatively by a single assessor.
* Statically analysis :
Student's t test will be used to compare 3D and Champy's miniplate fixation. A value of P ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Conditions
- Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
3D titanium miniplate
for study group by using 3D titanium miniplate under open reduction under general anesthesia with mono cortical screw, while in control group single titanium miniplate at superior border with mono cortical screw according to ideal line of osteosynthesis of champy
- DEVICE
-
Standard titanium miniplate- single non compression miniplate
single non compression miniplate placed at superior border with monocortical screws via intraoral approach
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Thamar University
collaborator OTHER -
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 17 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2013-10-31
- Completion
- 2013-10-31
Countries
- Egypt
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Trial of Custom-Made Titanium Plates Versus 3D Lambda Plates for Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures
NCT07231055 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Custom Plate vs. Standard Titanium Plates for Mandibular Sub-condylar Fractures Fixation
NCT06978530 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Prebent & Miniplates in Fixation of Lefort I Osteotomty in Maxillary Advancement.
NCT03752944 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Maxillary Stability in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Patients Using the Inverted Sequence Approach
NCT03353116 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Miniscrew Anchored Maxillary Protraction Protocols
NCT03712007 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dentoskeletal Effects of 3D-Printed Fixed Twin Block Versus MARA Appliances in Management of Skeletal Class II
NCT07340242 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
the Condylar Response of Mini-plate Anchored Rigid Fixed Functional Appliance Versus Dentally Anchored Semi-rigid One
NCT05466344 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
A Clinical Trial of Locally Made Titanium Miniplate and Screw in Maxillofacial Fractures Management
NCT04279925 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Validity of Computed Guided Technology in Proper Placement of Intermaxillary Fixation Screws in Mandibular Fractures
NCT06883331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
the Mini-plate Anchored Herbst Appliance Versus the Dentally Anchored Fixed Functional Appliance
NCT05440526 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of CAD/CAM vs Conventionally Constructed Occlusal Splints in Patients With Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
NCT04591899 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modified Twin Block in Skeletal Class II Growing Females With Mandibular Deficiency
NCT03635463 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Aesthetic Functional Appliances and Twin Block in Correction of Skeletal Class II
NCT06631235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Effects of Flat and Modified Inclined Fixed Anterior Bite Planes on Mandibular Position in Growing Females With Skeletal Class 2 Malocclusion Due to Mandibular Deficiency and Deep Bite
NCT03308175 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Using Two 3D Printed Occlusal Splints for Patients With Tempromandibular Disorder
NCT04455672 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Class III Malocclusion Using Modified Fixed Mandibular Retractor Appliance
NCT03354442 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Dimensional Assessment of Dentoskeletal Changes Associated With a Modified Twin Block Appliance
NCT06589206 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Dentoskeletal Changes After Treatment of Skeletal classII by Twinblock Versus Monoblock Appliances
NCT07277543 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusal Stabilization Splints Equilibrated by Different Techniques and Their Effect on TMD
NCT04661670 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assesment of Tempromandibular Joint ( TMJ ) Changes After Treatment of Skeletal Class II Cases by Twinblock vs Monoblock Appliances
NCT07270653 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mandibular First Molar Distalization
NCT04229797 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Class II Malocclusion Correction Using the Mini-screw Supported Advanced Molar Distalization Appliance
NCT06726694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Stabilizing Splint (Michigan-type Occlusal Splint) Versus Anterior Repositioning Splint .
NCT02960048 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Twin Block Appliance in Incremental Versus Maximum Bite Advancement in Skeletal Class II
NCT04562545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA