Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria.
NCT05180903 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28
Last updated 2023-09-26
Summary
The aim of this study will be to evaluate the clinical performance of polyethylene fiber reinforced resin composite restorations versus bulk fill resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth.
Conditions
- Dental Restoration Failure
Interventions
- OTHER
-
X-tra base & GrandioSO reinforced by Ribbond
The missing peripheral tooth structure will be built up via 2-mm wedge-shaped a universal hybrid resin composite, GrandioSO . Then the polyethylene fibers will be wetted with an unfilled resin first . After removing the excess resin, fibers will be covered with a very thin layer of flowable composite X-tra base . After that, fibers will be bonded immediately against the peripheral missing walls and cured for 20 seconds. Then a bulk-fill flowable resin composite lining X-tra base will be applied in approximately 4 mm thick in bulk increments as needed to fill the cavity 2 mm short of the occlusal cavosurface and each increment will be light cured for 20 s. The remaining occlusal part of the cavity will be restored with a universal hybrid resin composite, GrandioSO . The shade of the composite will be selected according to the teeth to be restored. All cavities will be restored with open-sandwich technique (Deliperi, et al. 2017).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Amira Farid Elzoghbi, Professor · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 55 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-07-10
- Completion
- 2023-09-10
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns
NCT06348979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
NCT05020093 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Resin Composite Restorations
NCT05418400 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Success of Bulk Fil Composite Versus Highly Viscous Glass Ionomer in Primary Class II Molars
NCT06235489 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of the Indirect Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth
NCT04561167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Simplified-Shade Nano-Hybrid Composite With Full-Coverage Silane Coating and High-Performance Pulverized Fillers
NCT07334509 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity Using Bioactive Cement Incementation of Indirect Composite Blocks
NCT04557657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Stainless Steel Crowns Versus Bulkfill Composite Resin for Restoring Primary Molars After Endodontic Treatment
NCT03186950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06260644 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Marginal and Internal Fit of High Performance Polymer PEEK Endocrown Using Two Preparation Designs
NCT06500845 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Ion Releasing Hybrid Restorative Material
NCT04854655 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Bulk-Fill Composite of Posterior Restorations
NCT03230604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT04152460 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using Snow Plow Versus Oscillating Packing Technique
NCT07033650 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Endocrowns Fabricated From Two Hybrid Ceramic Materials on Endodontically Treated Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07005167 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite
NCT02393989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Performance of Self Adhesive Giomer Containing Flowable Composite in Restoring Class V Cavities
NCT04944485 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
NCT05499494 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Sonic Fill and X-tra Fill in Clinical Performance
NCT04926883 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative vs. RMGI in Class V: A Randomized Control Trial
NCT03771196 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compariing a Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant To A Conventional Resin
NCT04052802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Giomer Based Technology Versus Smart Bioactive Restoration in Carious Class V Cavities
NCT05466461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations
NCT06183320 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Study Aims to Compare the Effectiveness of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-containing Adhesives vs Conventional Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Performance Composite Restorations Through Promoting Dentin Remineralization After Selective Caries Removal Over a Two-year Follow-up
NCT06990945 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA