MedTrace Logo

C-MAC Blade D Video Vs Macintosh Laryngoscope for Double Lumen Tube Insertion

NCT06759038 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-01-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to know which type of laryngoscope is better for Double Lumen Tube (DLT) insertion, in participants undergoing elective thoracic surgeries.

The main question aim to answer is Is C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope better than Macintosh laryngoscope for DLT insertion in term of time taking for intubation and hemodynamic changes to laryngoscopy? Researchers are comparing two groups of participants

* Participants in Group A are receiving intubation from C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope.
* Participants in Group B are receiving intubations from Macintosh laryngoscope.

Conditions

  • Video Laryngoscope
  • Double Lumen Tube Intubation
  • Elective Thoracic Surgery

Interventions

DEVICE

C-MAC blade D video laryngoscope

C-MAC blade D Video Laryngoscope is used for difficult intubation and for better glottic view

DEVICE

Macintosh Laryngoscope

Macintosh Laryngoscope is conventional laryngoscope used generally for intubations

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institue of Trauma

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-12-03
Primary Completion
2025-02-28
Completion
2025-03-31

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06759038 on ClinicalTrials.gov