Comparison of 3 Direct Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

NCT02955511 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 5

Last updated 2022-10-19

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Hypothesis The use of Macintosh blade sized #3.5 (vs Macintosh size #3) would reduce the time required to achieve successful tracheal intubation and improve the glottic view.

Study objective The purpose of this research study is to compare 3 different laryngoscope blades (sizes: 3.5, 3.5 and 3) and see if the blades size 3.5 will reduce the time required to achieve successful tracheal intubation and improve the physician's view of the glottis compared to the standard direct laryngoscope using the blade size 3, in patients undergoing lumbar surgery.

Primary end point: time to achieve successful tracheal intubation.

Secondary end points: glottic view at intubation, number of intubation attempts and effectiveness of the integrated suction in the Inscope Direct Laryngoscope.

Conditions

  • Anesthesia
  • Airway

Interventions

DEVICE

Blade MAC size 3

Patient will be intubated using the DL- Blade MAC size 3

DEVICE

Blade MAC size 3.5

Patient will be intubated using the DL- Blade MAC size 3.5

DEVICE

Inscope Blade size 3.5

Patient will be intubated using the Inscope Blade size 3.5

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Roya Yumul, MD, PhD · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SCREENING
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-02
Primary Completion
2021-09-15
Completion
2021-09-15
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02955511 on ClinicalTrials.gov