Comparison of Posterior and Anterior Approach to Sacrospinous Ligament Apical Fixation - Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04306250 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 280
Last updated 2024-04-02
Summary
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common problem among women. Apical prolapse (AP) is a prolapse of the uterus, or vaginal cuff, in women post hysterectomy.
Apical fixation to the sacrospinous ligament (SSLF) was first introduced in 1968 by K.RICHTER. .In a large review study, the subjective cure rate after SSLF ranged from 70 to 98%, while objective cure rate was 67-97%.
The success rates of SSLF in a randomized study comparing SSLF to uterosacral ligament fixation after two years were 63.1%. In women with combined apical and anterior wall prolapse, SSLF can be performed in two ways: anterior access through the anterior vaginal wall or posterior approach through the posterior vaginal wall.
A retrospective comparison of the two methods was performed, demonstrating some efficacy to the anterior approach over the posterior approach mainly in respect to the vaginal length.
From the literature review to date, no comparisons were made between the methods in a randomized controlled trial.
Objective: To compare the success rates between two approaches (anterior and posterior) for SSLF
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Apical prolapse fixation - anterior access
The surgery is done in anterior access
- PROCEDURE
-
Apical prolapse fixation - posterior access
The surgery is done in posterior access
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
HaEmek Medical Center, Israel
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
meirav breverman, MD · haemek medical center
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2020-07-09
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-31
- Completion
- 2025-12-31
Countries
- Israel
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Intraperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Uterosacral Ligament Suspensions for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse
NCT04172896 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
POPQ Versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair During Vaginal Reconstruction
NCT03187054 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Total Versus Subtotal Abdominal Hysterectomy at Time of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04178473 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lateral Suspension and Sacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03772691 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Apical Suspension Repair for Vault Prolapse In a Three-Arm Randomized Trial Design
NCT02676973 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension at the Time of Hysterectomy for Prevention of Vaginal Vault Prolapse
NCT01364025 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Vaginal Vault Suspension to the Uterosacral Ligaments for Stage II-III Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT03553511 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Novel Laparoscopic Apical Promontofixation Technique With Simultaneous Perineal Reconstruction for Patients With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07271862 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Lateral Suspension Operations
NCT04072588 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Effects of the Addition of Uterosacral Ligament Plication to Pectopexy Operation on Anatomical and Subjective Symptoms
NCT04508062 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-NSQIP Analysis.
NCT03421067 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effectiveness of Perineorrhaphy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT07006129 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT05063331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Different Procedures of Colpocleisis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06482697 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Efficacy of Sacrocolpopexy, the Amreich-Richter Procedure and Transvaginal Mesh
NCT03053479 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Post-hysterectomy Vaginal Cuff Prolapse Repair
NCT07174921 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Lateral Suspension in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03722563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Supracervical Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04797585 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy
NCT04850365 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized,Multicentric Study to Treat Prolapse After Hysterectomy With Amreich Procedure or Total Prolift Procedure
NCT00572702 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hysterectomy Versus Uterine Preservation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT04890951 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Prophylactic Modified McCall Culdoplasty During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT01840176 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Techniques in Uterine-preserving Apical Prolapsus Repair
NCT05143658 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA