Total Versus Subtotal Abdominal Hysterectomy at Time of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy

NCT04178473 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70

Last updated 2021-09-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Uterovaginal prolapse is a common disease. Due to high failure rate that occur following vaginal hysterectomy, sacrocolpopexy is investigated by many resarchers to manage uterovaginal prolapse in non-hystrectomized women.

In this study the investigator will compare the result of total versus subtotal hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial

Intervention:

Group A will have total abdominal hysterectomy Group B will have subtotal abdominal hysterectomy

Conditions

  • Prolapse Genital

Interventions

PROCEDURE

total abdominal hysterectomy

total abdominal hysterectomy at time of sacrocolpopexy

PROCEDURE

Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy

Subtotal abdominal hysterectomy at time of sacrocolpopexy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • South Valley University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohammad AM Ahmed, MD · South Valley University, Qena Faculty of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Qena, Qena, Egypt

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-01-01
Primary Completion
2021-01-30
Completion
2021-05-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04178473 on ClinicalTrials.gov