Single Versus Multi-port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Repair of Vaginal Apex Prolapse
NCT03034499 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2019-06-11
Summary
A prospective randomized controlled study intended to compare the efficacy of 2 methods of robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy for the repair of vaginal apex prolapse:
1. Via single-port.
2. Via multi-port.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Single-port sacrocolpopexy
Single-port sacrocolpopexy surgery for the repair of vaginal apex prolapse.
- PROCEDURE
-
Multi-port sacrocolpopexy
Multi-port sacrocolpopexy surgery for the repair of vaginal apex prolapse.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Rambam Health Care Campus
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Roy Lauterbach, MD · Rambam Health Care Campus
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 30 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-03-20
- Primary Completion
- 2018-11-01
- Completion
- 2019-04-01
Countries
- Israel
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Abdominal Versus Vaginal Hysteropexy
NCT03494582 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Costs and Patient Perceptions in Sacrocolpopexy for Prolapse
NCT04179955 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Lateral Suspension Versus Sacral Colpopexy POP
NCT03644628 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Perineorrhaphy in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
NCT07006129 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Difference in Pain, Quality of Life Following Vaginal Hysterectomy With Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Colpopexy?
NCT02049996 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cost-effectiveness Comparison Between Vaginal Versus Robotic Mesh Surgery for Apical Prolapse: Prospective, Cohort Study
NCT03878056 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
POPQ Versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair During Vaginal Reconstruction
NCT03187054 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy Versus Trans-vaginal Repair for Anterior Rectocele.
NCT06633172 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse
NCT01594372 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
0050-19-RMB CTIL - VNOTES Compared to VH for Vaginal Apex Prolapse
NCT04078802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Complications Associated With Promontofixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic and Non-robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures
NCT01320215 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Vs Robotic-assisted Colposacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02852512 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05969067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic/Robotic-assisted Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT02877407 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Supracervical Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04797585 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of Different Procedures of Colpocleisis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06482697 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sacropexy With Robot-Assisted Surgical System
NCT00886223 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study for Vaginal Vault Prolapse After Hysterectomy: Comparison of Two Surgical Methods
NCT02290288 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT05063331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Uphold Hysteropexy and Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT01377142 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT03436147 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Transvaginal Versus Transobturator Paravaginal Repair
NCT03489902 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies
NCT01124916 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy/Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery
NCT05682989 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA