Efficacy/Safety of Urogynecology Synthetic Mesh Surgery
NCT05682989 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2023-04-05
Summary
This is a retrospective cohort study, aiming at analyzing the efficacy and safety of mesh surgery in pelvic organ prolapse. The synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse include transvaginal mesh or laparotomy, laparoscope, or robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with mesh augmentation. The investigators would like to evaluate the efficacy and safety, such as recurrence rates and complication rates for women who underwent urogynecology mesh surgery.
Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Stage III and IV High Grade Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Urodynamic investigations before and after a mesh surgery protocol.
Urodynamic investigations (The urodynamic study included free uroflowmetry, postvoid residual, filling and voiding cystometry, and a urethral pressure profile. The filling cystometry and urethral pressure profile were performed with 37 degrees C normal saline similar to body temperature at an infusion rate of 80 ml/min.
- PROCEDURE
-
Urodynamic investigations before and after a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy protocol.
All surgeries were performed using a DaVinci robotic system (Intuitive® Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, California,US) with standardized technique and materials. Patients were positioned in dorsal lithotomy and steep Trendelenburg position. Trocars were placed bilaterally, and an assistant port was placed laterally. The peritoneum was opened medial to the ureter to develop an avascular space. The mesh was placed on the posterior and anterior vaginal wall and fixed at the level of anterior longitudinal ligaments S1/S2 by sutures. An intraoperative clinical examination was performed to ensure the mesh was in a tension-free position.
- PROCEDURE
-
Urodynamic investigations before and after a hysterectomy with trans-vaginal mesh repair
In summary, a vertical incision was made in the anterior vaginal wall to access the vesicovaginal space. The sacrospinous ligament was dissected, and an applicator was inserted and positioned over the SSL. The anchor was fixed to the SSL and the thread was attached to the mesh. The mesh was then adjusted in a tension-free manner, excess mesh was cut, and the incision was closed with suture.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Mackay Medical College
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Hui-Hsuan Lau, M.D. · Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 30 Years
- Max Age
- 100 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2023-08-01
- Completion
- 2027-12-31
Countries
- Taiwan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT05063331 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Costs and Patient Perceptions in Sacrocolpopexy for Prolapse
NCT04179955 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Safety and Efficacy of Different Procedures of Colpocleisis: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06482697 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Pectopexy With and Without Mesh Use for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
NCT07306715 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Hysterectomy vs Supracervical Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04797585 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation and Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension as a Uterine Preserving Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06982157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Novel Approach to Posterior Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy
NCT04358978 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Concomitant Posterior Colporrhaphy on Bowel Functions in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT06128291 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Colporrhaphies in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT06902909 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT00581334 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Apical Suspension Repair for Vault Prolapse In a Three-Arm Randomized Trial Design
NCT02676973 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Transluminal Endoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT06004089 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Sacrocolpopexy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Lateral Suspension in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT03722563 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During Sacrocolpopexy
NCT05969067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AMBULAPSE STUDY Feasibility Study on Laparoscopic Double-mesh Sacrocolpopexy With or Without Robotic Assistance, in Female Patients Presenting With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Based on an Outpatient Treatment Model.
NCT03764852 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trail of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06418438 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension With Mesh & Sacrocervicopexy for the Treatment of Uterine Prolapse
NCT03421457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Outcome After Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy, a Case Series Review
NCT01055860 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Mesh-Based and Mesh-Free Laparoscopic Pectopexy in Uterus-Preserving Surgery for Apical Prolapse
NCT07080957 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy.
NCT04178083 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Robotic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02741830 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
SCP vs HUSLS for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT02800512 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy and Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Surgeries
NCT05930795 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Follow-up of Mesh/Native Tissue Complications Study(Part I)
NCT03620565 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Randomized Trial of Y Mesh vs Dual Mesh
NCT02156687 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA