Assessment of Maximal Incisal Opening Using Patient Specific Titanium Eminoplasty Versus Inlay Autogenous Bone Graft for Treatment of Chronic Mandibular Condylar Dislocation
NCT03728270 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 12
Last updated 2018-11-02
Summary
In the small and highly specialized field of TMJ surgical treatments, restriction of the mandibular condylar movement outside of the articular eminence is one of the treatment choices suggested in TMJ dislocation.
Limitation of translation of the condyle in TMJ dislocation by inlay autogenous bone graft is the classic method to hinder the movement of the condyle beyond the articular eminence.
Patient specific TMJ prosthesis is very promising nowadays that it will not only build on the strengths of the current TMJ systems but will take advantage of digital innovations in custom design and three-dimensional(3D) printing of TMJ prosthesis. Moreover, TMJ Titanium eminoloplasty was reported to be a predictable and flexible instrument for TMJ dislocation treatment.
Thus, the investigators are conducting this study to compare the effect of both methods on the improvement of the maximal incisal opening of patients with chronic mandibular condylar dislocation, aiming to solve the problem of increasing the mouth opening of patients in their daily mouth opening. Also to reduce the community's fear from such a problem, which sometimes prevent patients from seeking treatment at their dentists leading to more serious complications that can be avoided. Furthermore, the investigators are trying to provide an evidence for oral and maxillofacial surgeons in order to provide the best quality service with the least expenses and thus gaining the patients' trust and saving time, money and effort.
Conditions
- Chronic Mandibular Condylar Dislocation
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Patient Specific Titanium Eminoplasty
* The stages of virtual surgical planning and fabrication of patient specific titanium eminoplasty will be designed my Mimics 15 program. * Once designed, the virtual design and surgery will be planned on a computer model where vital anatomical structures could be identified and thus could be avoided during surgery. * After obtaining all the dataset needed from the CT scan, the collected data will be sent to the Egyptian soil, water and environmental institution for manufacturing, packing and sterilization of the patient specific titanium eminence. * The patient specific titanium eminence will be inserted and secured with two to three screws of individual lengths according to the virtual plan. * Functional mandibular movements were reproduced to confirm absence of subluxation and checked for interference and any required adjustments made. * A multilayer closure of the incisions will be accomplished using Vicryl
- PROCEDURE
-
Inlay Autogenous Bone Graft
\* Steps to harvest the bone graft: * Down-fracture of the articular eminence to be augmented with Inlay bone graft to increase the vertical height of the articular eminence. A green-stick fracture will be created avoiding a possible complete fracture of the lower segment of the eminence * To obtain Inlay bone graft from the chin, anterior mandibular vestibule incision will provide good access to the mandibular symphysis.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-12-01
- Completion
- 2020-02-01
More Related Trials
-
" Comparative Evaluation of Aggressive Gap Arthroplasty With Minimal Gap Arthroplasty in the Management of TMJ Ankylosis "
NCT05618795 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Champy Versus AO for Mandible Fractures
NCT00628849 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
3D Printed Titanium Mesh vs Guided Autogenous Graft
NCT05550285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Non-resorbable Membranes Versus Titanium Meshes and Resorbable Membranes
NCT04332679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Regenerative Combined Therapy With Enamel Matrix Derivative and Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Graft
NCT02828423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Assessment of Computer-assisted PEEK Versus Conventional Titanium Plates on Mandibular Body Fractures
NCT03466190 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-dimensional Bone Regeneration Using Custom-made Meshes With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT04286334 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness of a Flexible Hydroxyapatite-Based Composite for Jaw Bone Regeneration
NCT06552715 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Vertical Augmentation Using Onlay Versus Inlay Autogenous Graft With Simultaneous Implant Placement.
NCT03052387 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft
NCT02998632 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Buccal Bone Dehiscence
NCT05445986 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Autogenous Bone Mixed With Xenograft Versus Xenograft Alone Versus Absorbent Gelatin Sponge
NCT03584984 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
CAD/CAM Angle Fracture Reduction/Plate Guide and Customized 3D Grid Plate Versus Champy's Technique
NCT06392204 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Vertical Ridge Augmentation for Posterior Mandible by Computer Guided Onlay vs Free Hand Onlay Graft
NCT05512078 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between Three Different Plating Techniques in Management of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.
NCT06323122 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Autogenous Bone Ring Versus Split Bone Block for Management of Posterior Atrophic Mandible
NCT07140887 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Autogenous Bone Graft and Screw Tent-Pole Technique on Atrophic Mandible
NCT04133090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Titanium Miniplates Versus 3D Titanium Mesh Method of Fixation for Double Barrel Vascularized Fibular Graft
NCT04704167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Dimensional Printed Customized Titanium Mesh for Mandibular Augmentation
NCT05198011 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstruction of Deficient Maxillary Ridges Using Retromolar Blocks With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT06900933 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Adequacy of One Point Fixation of Displaced Zygomatic Complex Fracture
NCT03484676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Modified Omega Plate in the Management of Mandibular Fractures Compared With Conventional Fixation
NCT07206134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Interlocking Miniplates in Fixation of Mandibular Fractures in the Mental Foramen Region: A Split-mouth Study
NCT06939010 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Digital Occlusal Wafer Versus Waferless Distal Segment Repositioning for BSSO in Skeletal Mandibular Deformities
NCT05151042 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Amnion Chorion Membrane vs. Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane in Ridge Preservation Procedures
NCT02602223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2