MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Amnion Chorion Membrane vs. Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane in Ridge Preservation Procedures

NCT02602223 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 9

Last updated 2016-10-07

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine if a biologically active commercially available amnion chorion membrane (ACM) is as effective as the commercially available inert dense polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (D-PTFE) in preserving jaw bone dimensions and whether it provides the added benefit of reducing post-operative discomfort after dental surgery

Conditions

  • Alveolar Bone Loss
  • Pathological Conditions, Anatomical

Interventions

DEVICE

Placing Amnion chorion membrane over grafted site

Selected teeth were extracted with minimal trauma to hard and soft tissues. The extraction sites were evaluated to verify presence of intact socket walls. Sockets were thoroughly debrided and a combination of demineralized freeze-dried bone and mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft from a single lot number (Maxxeus, Ohio, U.S.A) was placed in the sockets. Per randomization protocol ACM (BioXclude, Snoasis Medical, Colorado, U.S.A were tucked into the buccal and lingual flaps, which were minimally elevated (2-3mm) and d-PTFE sutures (Osteogenics Medical, Texas, U.S.A) were used to keep membrane in place. Primary closure was not attempted and membranes were intentionally left exposed

DEVICE

Placing d-PTFE membrane over grafted site

Selected teeth were extracted with minimal trauma to hard and soft tissues. The extraction sites were evaluated to verify presence of intact socket walls. Sockets were thoroughly debrided and a combination of demineralized freeze-dried bone and mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft from a single lot number (Maxxeus, Ohio, U.S.A) was placed in the sockets. Per randomization protocol d-PTFE membranes (Cytoplast, Osteogenics Medical, Texas, U.S.A) were tucked into the buccal and lingual flaps, which were minimally elevated (2-3mm) and d-PTFE sutures (Osteogenics Medical, Texas, U.S.A) were used to keep membrane in place. Primary closure was not attempted and membranes were intentionally left exposed

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Snoasis Medical Products

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • Indiana University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Sivaraman Prakasam, BDS., MSD., PhD · Oregon Health & Science University & Indiana University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-09-30
Primary Completion
2014-07-31
Completion
2014-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02602223 on ClinicalTrials.gov