MedTrace Logo

3D Printed Titanium Mesh vs Guided Autogenous Graft

NCT05550285 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32

Last updated 2022-09-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In this study, the hypothesis states that there is no significant difference between specified populations. In our case, the 3D printed patient-specific titanium mesh is thought to have the same effect and results in comparison with the computer-guided calvarial bone graft technique according to the related studies.

Conditions

  • Orbital Floor (Blow-Out) Open Fracture
  • Enophthalmos Traumatic

Interventions

DEVICE

orbital floor recontriction

Guided Calvarial Graft Harvesting vs 3D Printed Titanium mesh

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mohammed Ghassan Mohammed Shaalan

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohamed Farid Shehab, Professor · Professor, Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Cairo University

  • Heba Mohamed Kamel, Assistant Professor · Assistant professor, Oral & Maxillofacial surgery, Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-09-01
Primary Completion
2023-01-01
Completion
2023-01-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05550285 on ClinicalTrials.gov