Vertical Ridge Augmentation With Autogenous Onlay Blocks Combined With Guided Bone Regeneration Versus Autogenous Bone Graft With Titanium Mesh in Posterior Mandible
NCT03680118 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2018-11-21
Summary
Atrophic ridge augmentation utilizing guided bone regeneration (GBR) has become a major treatment option to provide optimal bone support for osseointegrated dental implants. GBR was initially employed to treat simple defects, including dehiscence and fenestration defects. In addition, GBR has been utilized for horizontal and vertical ridge augmentations and has demonstrated reproducible outcomes, with high implant survival rates and low complication rates. The results of recent clinical and histologic studies of ridge augmentation with GBR indicated that autogenous bone graft may be a suitable material for staged localized ridge augmentation in both horizontal and vertical augmentations. The main advantages of autogenous grafts are their osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive capabilities. Because of these qualities, autogenous grafts are considered by many to be the gold standard for bone regeneration
Conditions
- Posterior Mandible With Deficient Ridge Height
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
autogenous rings with GBR and autogenous graft with ti-mesh
* Autogenous Onlay ring block harvested from either mandibular ramus or chin will be placed over the defected site and fixed using titanium screws (1.6mm diameter) and then GBR using autogenous particulate will be placed around and over the blocks and covered with a resorbable bilayer collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®, Geistlich, USA) * Autogenous bone graft will be placed on the defected site and covered by a titanium mesh which will be fixed by titanium screws. * Flap advancement will be acquired by releasing the mylohyoid muscle attachment from the lingual flap and periosteal releasing incision for the buccal flap to provide tension free closure. * The flap will then be copiously irrigated with saline in preparation for closure. * The flap will then be closed using horizontal mattress and interrupted 4/0 polypropylene sutures.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-12-15
- Primary Completion
- 2019-11-30
- Completion
- 2019-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Guided Bone Regeneration in Atrophic Anterior Maxillary Ridges
NCT03731416 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Horizontal Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Sticky Bone Versus Collagen Membrane GBR
NCT03697616 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
GBR With Ptfe With Bovine Bone With and Without Autogenous
NCT03628157 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Ridge Augmentation in Posterior Mandible Using Tunneling Technique With Amix of Autogenous Bone and Xenograft With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT03712631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation: Particulate v/s Block Graft
NCT02487784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Bone Ring Versus Split Bone Block for Management of Posterior Atrophic Mandible
NCT07140887 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Vertical Ridge Augmentation for Posterior Mandible by Computer Guided Onlay vs Free Hand Onlay Graft
NCT05512078 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstruction of Deficient Maxillary Ridges Using Retromolar Blocks With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT06900933 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dehydrated Human Amnion-Chorion and Type 1 Bovine Collagen Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT03290638 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-dimensional Bone Regeneration Using Custom-made Meshes With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT04286334 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical and Horizontal Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Techniques
NCT06636084 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Double-Flap Incision, Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision, and Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap to Periosteal Releasing Incision for Flap Advancement
NCT03787342 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of The Post-Extraction Dimensional Alterations Following Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Partially and Completely Demineralized Dentin Grafts Versus Autogenous Whole-tooth Graft
NCT05766137 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flap Advancement Techniques in Ridge Augmentation
NCT03071523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Grafts for Anterior Maxillary Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
NCT06206577 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstruction of Deficient Atrophic Ridges Using Guide Bone Regeneration Technique
NCT06746935 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05347017 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Vertical Bone Gain After Ridge Augmentation With APRF & Xenograft Vs Collagen Membrane & Xenograft. RCT
NCT03855852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation With Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Bone Blocks With Autogenous Tooth Graft
NCT05407363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical Augmentation Using Onlay Versus Inlay Autogenous Graft With Simultaneous Implant Placement.
NCT03052387 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Using Polyvinylidene Fluoride Versus Titanium Mesh Membranes
NCT07095530 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Symphysis Onlay Bone Graft, Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin (I-PRF) and Xenograft on Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation in Esthetic Zone
NCT06388837 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation Comparing a Block Allograft to a Demineralized Bone Matrix Allograft.
NCT02127112 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Simultaneous Implant Placement With Vertical and Horizontal Bone Augmentation
NCT06313229 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Non-resorbable Membranes Versus Titanium Meshes and Resorbable Membranes
NCT04332679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA