Comparison of Double-Flap Incision, Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision, and Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap to Periosteal Releasing Incision for Flap Advancement
NCT03787342 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 38
Last updated 2020-07-22
Summary
Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) is a reliable method to augment insufficient bone volume for implant placement. Membrane exposure is a major complication which is avoided by tension free primary closure. Classically Periosteal Releasing Incision (PRI) is performed to advance the flap. The aim of this trial is to compare Double Flap Incision (DFI), Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision (MPRI) \& Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap (CALF) to PRI in terms of flap advancement, postoperative pain \& swelling, membrane exposure and the amount of bone gain clinically and radiographically in GBR procedures.
Conditions
- Flap Advancement
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Double Flap Incision
A full-thickness crestal incision will be made over the edentulous ridge, and then one partial-thickness vertical incision will be made on the buccal side. A partial-thickness flap will be raised first to separate the mucosal layer from the overlying periosteum. Subsequently, the periosteal layer will be elevated to expose the underlying alveolar process. Xenograft and Ti-mesh will be used to augment the defective site then periosteal flap will be sutured first, with periosteal sutures securing the regenerative site. Then the mucosal flap will be closed.
- PROCEDURE
-
Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision
A full-thickness muco-periosteal flap is reflected on the buccal side (crestal incision and two vertical releasing incisions). Near the base of mucoperiosteal flap, the periosteum is incised less than 0.5mm in depth, creating two segments, "coronal segment" and "apical segment," of the periosteal flap. The shallow incision helps in preventing damage to the submucosal layer. The flap is pulled with a pair of periodontal forceps laterally. Subsequently, the "lateral stretching" of the coronal segment of the flap is performed by applying pressure using the blunt face of scalpel blade with sweeping motion to allow flap advancement.
- PROCEDURE
-
Coronally Advanced Lingual Flap
A full-thickness crestal incision will be performed in the keratinized tissue from the distal surface of the more distal tooth to the retromolar pad. The flap design will be continued intrasulcularly on both vestibular and lingual sides of the mesial portion of the flap, buccally, it will be finished with a vertical releasing incision. On the lingual side, a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated until reaching the mylohyoid line. Then, using a blunt instrument it will be localized a connective tissue band continuing with the epimysium of the mylohyoid muscle. The blunt instrument will be inserted below this connective band, and, with gentle traction in the coronal direction, this muscular insertion will be detached from the lingual flap.
- PROCEDURE
-
Periosteal releasing incision
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Nada Zazou, Masters · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-12-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-08-30
- Completion
- 2019-09-30
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Vertical Ridge Augmentation With Autogenous Onlay Blocks Combined With Guided Bone Regeneration Versus Autogenous Bone Graft With Titanium Mesh in Posterior Mandible
NCT03680118 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Custom-made Ceramic Barrier vs Titanium Mesh
NCT03734094 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vascularized Inter-positional Periosteal Connective-tissue Flap Versus Collagen Membrane in Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT05813340 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation in Posterior Mandible Using Tunneling Technique With Amix of Autogenous Bone and Xenograft With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT03712631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical and Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Onlay Blocks Combined With Guided Bone Regeneration Using Native Collagen Membrane in Atrophic Anterior Maxilla.
NCT03895060 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-dimensional Bone Regeneration Using Custom-made Meshes With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT04286334 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Horizontal Bone Gain in the Lower Posterior Partially Edentulous Patient Comparing the Stabilization of Membranes With and Without Tacs
NCT06257225 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Nonincised Papillae in the Treatment of Intrabony Defects.
NCT04376450 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Additive Manufacturing Personalized Titanium Mesh in Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT06692244 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Impact of Prefabricated Acrylic Splints on Premaxillary Stability in Alveolar Cleft Bone Graft Repairs: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06807645 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficiency of Computer Guided Ridge Splitting Using Piezosurgery in Horizontally Deficient Posterior Mandible
NCT03748615 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Regenerated With Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) Using Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Membrane
NCT06186232 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bone Gain Following Composite Graft Rehabilitation of Horizontal Maxilla Atrophy With Sausage Technique Utilizing (Pericardial) Collagen Membrane
NCT06831214 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Horizontal Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Sticky Bone Versus Collagen Membrane GBR
NCT03697616 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-resorbable Membranes Versus Titanium Meshes and Resorbable Membranes
NCT04332679 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed Titanium Mesh vs Guided Autogenous Graft
NCT05550285 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Mixture of Autogenous and Xenograft Particulate Versus Patient-Specific Sticky Bone for Horizontal Anterior Maxillary Defect
NCT07113886 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Changes After Immediate Implant Placement or Socket Preservation With or Without Surgical Flap in The Aesthetic Zone
NCT03690973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Reconstruction of Deficient Maxillary Ridges Using Retromolar Blocks With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT06900933 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Vertical Ridge Augmentation for Posterior Mandible by Computer Guided Onlay vs Free Hand Onlay Graft
NCT05512078 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration With Customized Titanium Meshes
NCT04480073 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Histological Assessment of Autogenous Onlay Block Versus Cortical Shell on Anterior Maxilla
NCT06450535 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs Autologous Bone Blocks in the Lateral Augmentation of the Jaws
NCT07104370 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Dental Implant Placement in the Anterior Esthetic Zone Using Two Guided Bone Regeneration Techniques: Prefabricated CAD/CAM Zirconia Membrane vs. Contour Augmentation.
NCT06987149 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Guided Cortical Shell Technique for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
NCT06942013 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA