Posterior Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft
NCT02998632 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2016-12-20
Summary
* Patients will be diagnosed to determine whether they are eligible for the inclusion criteria of this study or not. Patients who are eligible will start their surgical treatment in the next visit after radiographic and surgical site evaluation.
* On the day of surgery, each patient will be assigned to either intervention or control group, the patients will receive inferior alveolar nerve block and long buccal nerve anesthesia. Future implant site will be planned, an incision will be made and flap will be reflected along the defective ridge.
* Implant fixture/s will be inserted in the previously planned site. Uncovered fixture threads and bone defect will be covered by MPM or autogenous bone graft.
* In the control group, autogenous particulate bone graft will be used for vertical augmentation and covered with titanium reinforced membrane. In the intervention group, MPM (Mineralized plasmatic matrix) will be used.
* Edges will be approximated, Sutures will be placed.
* Osstell instrument will be used to measure and record fixture primary stability in ISQ units.
* Patients will be referred to the fixed prosthodontics department for placement of the crowns after ensuring success of osseointegration and implant stability (after 4 months).
* Patients will evaluate their overall satisfaction after fitting the final prosthesis using a questionnaire at 9 months.
* After 9 months, CBCT will be performed to evaluate augmented bone height to be compared with the bone height previously recorded in CBCT.
* Osstell instrument will be used to evaluate the implant stability ratio in ISQ unit to be compared to the ratio recorded before.
Conditions
- Bone Augmentation
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Mineralized plasmatic matrix for bone augmentation
Vertical bone augmentation of defective posterior mandibular alveolar ridge using MPM (Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix) bone graft.
- PROCEDURE
-
Autogenous bone for bone augmentation
Vertical bone augmentation of defective posterior mandibular alveolar ridge using autogenous bone graft (gold standard) covered by titanium membrane.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-12-31
- Completion
- 2017-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Ascending Ramus Versus Chin Cortical Plates for Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxilla
NCT03629860 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Xenograft Versus PRF
NCT03177356 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Guided Versus Free Hand Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in Anterior Mandible.
NCT05556330 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One Stage Ridge Splitting Using 2 Different Techniques in the Posterior Mandible
NCT06891313 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix With and Without Collagen Membrane in Peri-implant Bone Regeneration
NCT04816110 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Reconstruction of Deficient Maxillary Ridges Using Retromolar Blocks With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT06900933 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Histological Assessment of Autogenous Onlay Block Versus Cortical Shell on Anterior Maxilla
NCT06450535 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation in Posterior Mandible Using Tunneling Technique With Amix of Autogenous Bone and Xenograft With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT03712631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Splitting Using Autogenous Bone Wedge Versus the Conventional Intercortical Augmentation Technique in Horizontally Deficient Anterior Maxilla
NCT06529653 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Autogenous Bone Block Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05347017 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bone Quality and Quantity for Three Dimensional Bone Augmentation for Maxilla Using Patient Specific Titanium Meshes Loaded With Bone Marrow Aspirate Mixed With Xenograft Versus Xenograft Mixed With Autografts Only: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05400044 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Horizontal Ridge Augmentation of the Mandible Autogenous Block Grafts
NCT03183336 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Vertical Ridge Augmentation for Posterior Mandible by Computer Guided Onlay vs Free Hand Onlay Graft
NCT05512078 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Fixation Free Sandwich Osteotomy With an Interpositional Inlay Graft in Compere to Conventional Sandwich Osteotomy
NCT06089928 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Facial Symmetry Following Fibula Free Flap Fixated in a Prosthetically Favorable Position Versus the Inferior Border Position for Mandibular Reconstruction
NCT06790628 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Bone Ring Versus Split Bone Block for Management of Posterior Atrophic Mandible
NCT07140887 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Block Graft Versus Particulate Deproteinized Bovine Bone Graft for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
NCT05374083 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Autogenous Bone Block and Tent Pole Technique for Augmentation of Atrophic Anterior Maxilla
NCT06125938 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Vertical Bone Gain After Ridge Augmentation With APRF & Xenograft Vs Collagen Membrane & Xenograft. RCT
NCT03855852 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Mixture of Autogenous and Xenograft Particulate Versus Patient-Specific Sticky Bone for Horizontal Anterior Maxillary Defect
NCT07113886 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Autogenous Bone Graft and Screw Tent-Pole Technique on Atrophic Mandible
NCT04133090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Graft for Ridge Preservation With and Without Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin
NCT05437172 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between PEEK With Autogenous Bone Graft and PEEK With Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
NCT06521853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between Three Different Plating Techniques in Management of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.
NCT06323122 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ridge Augmentation Using Patient Specific PEEK Sheets vs. Autogenous Bone Shell Technique.
NCT03607006 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA