Immediate Implants in Maxillary Premolar Region Using Xenograft vs Allograft
NCT03716323 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 42
Last updated 2018-10-23
Summary
Immediate implant placement has the disadvantage of difficulty in obtaining primary stability, lack of adequate soft tissue coverage and also the control of the implant position is difficult in addition to the cost of the graft. Autogenous bone graft is considered to be the golden standard for grafting as it has osteoconductive , osteoinductive and osteogenic functions , however it has the problems of donor site morbidity , the need for two surgeries as well as post operative swelling and discomfort of the patient , so alternative bone grafts as allografts and xenografts, has been introduced.
Conditions
- Badly Broken Maxillary Premolars Indicated for Extraction
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
immediate premolar implant with xenograft and allograft
* A peritome will be used for atraumatic extraction of remaining roots. * The extraction socket will be evaluated for absence of any fenestration or granulation tissues. * Copious normal saline irrigation and curettage will be performed. * In the study group: Immediate implant insertion following standard manufacturer's recommended surgical protocol followed by grafting the jumping gap with cortico-cancellous allograft (MinerOss®, BioHorizons, USA) * In the control group: Immediate implant insertion following standard manufacturer's recommended surgical protocol followed by grafting the jumping gap with anorganic bovine bone mineral xenograft (Bio-Oss®, Geistlich, USA)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2019-10-31
- Completion
- 2019-11-30
More Related Trials
-
Radiographic and the Esthetic Outcome of Two Different Bone Grafting Techniques in Early Implant Placement
NCT03302143 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Preimplant Site Augmentation Using MPM Versus Autogenous Bone Graft
NCT03007069 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Provisionalization Using Different Bone Grafts as a Space Filling Material in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT03741036 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
An RCT Comparing Xenograft and Allograft for Ridge Preservation
NCT02330523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Alveolar Ridge and Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Graft From the Maxillary Tuberosity
NCT05670067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigate New Surgical Techniques to Improve Esthetics and Patient Satisfaction at Implant Sites
NCT04101552 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Adjunctive Benefit of Xenograft Plus a Membrane During Sinus Crestal Approach
NCT04662333 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss After Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone With Nanobone Versus Xenograft
NCT03536260 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Simultaneous Implant Placement With Vertical and Horizontal Bone Augmentation
NCT06313229 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Buccal Bone Dehiscence
NCT05445986 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Repeated Injection of I PRF and Autogenous Bone Graft for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
NCT06711250 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Provisionalization Into Extraction Sockets With Labial Plate Dehiscence Defects Within the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT03676244 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Deproteinized Bovine Bone vs Deproteinized Bovine Bone With HAM Gel
NCT06916026 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Hyaluronic Acid in Addition to Xenograft in Immediate Implant Placement Within Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT06783517 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs Autologous Bone Blocks in the Lateral Augmentation of the Jaws
NCT07104370 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Grafting of the Peri-implant Bony Defects Around Immediate Implants Using Xenogenic Versus Alloplastic Sticky Grafts: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT06653868 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study Between Three Different Plating Techniques in Management of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.
NCT06323122 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Platlet Rich Fibrin as Space Filling Material Versus the Use of Deprotienized Bovine Bone (Tutogen) in Maxillary Premolars.
NCT03183349 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and Bone Gain Following Autogenous Particulate Sticky Bone Preparation With Xenograft Versus Without Xenograft for Grafting of Maxillary Anterior Knife Edge Ridge in Partially Edentulous Patients for Implant Placement
NCT03556111 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluate Marginal B. Loss in Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone Using Socket Shield Versus Xenograft
NCT03394625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Mandibular Ridge Augmentation Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft
NCT02998632 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Using "Nanobone" Versus "Autogenous Bone" for Treatment of Patients With Unrestorable Single Tooth.
NCT02613663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation With Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Bone Blocks With Autogenous Tooth Graft
NCT05407363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ridge Augmentation in Posterior Mandible Using Tunneling Technique With Amix of Autogenous Bone and Xenograft With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT03712631 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Symphysis Onlay Bone Graft, Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin (I-PRF) and Xenograft on Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation in Esthetic Zone
NCT06388837 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA