MedTrace Logo

Comparing the Secondary Stability of Dental Implants: Immediate Gradual Loading Versus Early Loading Protocol in Posterior Maxilla

NCT02309125 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10

Last updated 2014-12-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this split mouth study is to compare which method is better in reducing bone loss and healing times following implants. Specifically, the two methods investigated will be immediate gradual loading and early loading protocol.

Research Hypothesis Immediate gradual loading using gingival formers is superior to early loading protocols in improving bone quality and thus reducing the healing time.

Conditions

  • Dental Implant
  • Transmucosal Healing
  • Bone Loss

Interventions

PROCEDURE

immediate progressive loading using gingival formers

Implant placement will be 1 mm subcrestally, and it will receive transmucosal healing using gingival former. The gingival former will be replaced every 2 weeks by consequent larger size gingival former (at surgery time group A will receive 2 mm height gingival former which will be swapped by,3 mm, 4 mm and the last is 5 mm).

PROCEDURE

submerged healing

the implant placement will be 1 mm subcrestally, and it will receive unloaded healing.(submerged healing)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • elhassan mossad, oral surgeon · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
25 Years
Max Age
55 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-12-31
Primary Completion
2015-03-31
Completion
2015-04-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02309125 on ClinicalTrials.gov