A Clinical Trial of Three Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
NCT01320657 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 96
Last updated 2022-12-22
Summary
This is a clinical study involving patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances ('train-track braces'). A new type of train-track has recently been marketed. Over 4 million patients worldwide are wearing on of these appliances; this system is considerably more expensive than a normal train-track. However, there is little evidence to support its use.
The effects of three different types of train-track will be assessed with respect to the quality of Orthodontic tooth movement produced. Furthermore, the impact of the different train-tracks on daily life of orthodontic patients will also be measured. Consequently, the investigators will be able to inform orthodontists' decisions relating to the choice of train-track they recommend for their patients. In addition, should the more expensive appliances demonstrate objective or subjective advantage, a significant efficiency saving may develop.
Conditions
- Orthodontic Treatment
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Conventional orthodontic bracket, passive self-ligating brackets and active self-ligating bracket
Subjects randomized to treatment with one of three fixed orthodontic appliances: Damon Q, InOvation C and Ovation brackets. A pre-determined archwire sequence will be used involving round nickel titanium, rectangular nickel titanium progressing to 0.019 X 0.025 inch stainless steel; specific archwire sequences and appointment intervals will be based on the manufacturer's guidelines. All erupted teeth will have attachments placed from the outset. Treated for a minimum of 8 months with the 0.019 X 0.025 inch stainless steel archwire in place for at least 8 weeks.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
collaborator OTHER_GOV -
Southend NHS Foundation Trust
collaborator OTHER -
Barts & The London NHS Trust
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Robert t Lee, MDS · Royal London Dental Institute
-
Ama Johal, PhD · QMUL
-
Valeria Marinho, PhD · QMUL
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2012-08-31
- Completion
- 2013-05-31
Countries
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Study to Measure the Effect of Part Time Versus Full Time Orthodontic Appliance Wear
NCT02190630 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Appointment Intervals and Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT04050657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Acceptance During the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion
NCT03976635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
3D-Printed Vs Thermoformed Retainers: Comparison of Post-Treatment Stability, Changes in Mechanical Properties and Patients' OHRQoL
NCT05968625 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intermittent Vibrational Force and Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT02314975 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness of the Twin Block and Carriere Motion Appliances in Post-pubertal Patients and an Evaluation of the Impact of Class II Malocclusion and Its Correction on Oral Health-related Quality of Life
NCT07292636 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Compare Two Functional Appliances for Class II Malocclusions
NCT03773783 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Tailored Electronic Reminders on Compliance With Removable Orthodontic Retention
NCT03224481 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Treatment Impact on Life Experience of Adolescents With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06518733 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effectiveness of Electronic Reminders in Improving Elastic Compliance in Orthodontic Patients
NCT03144323 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pain and Discomfort With Anterior Versus Posterior Builds-up
NCT04105127 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
CAD/CAM Fixed Retainers vs. Conventional Multistranded Fixed Retainers in Orthodontic Patients. Comparison of Stability, Retainer Failure Rate, Adverse Effects, Cost-effectiveness, and Patient Satisfaction. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT04389879 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microbial Adherence, Surface Roughness, Effectiveness and Impact on Patients Between Conventional and 3D Printed Twin Block Appliances
NCT06944860 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
How Often Should We See Our Orthodontic Patients
NCT02918240 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compliance After Orthodontic Treatment Using Thermoplastic or Hawley Retainers
NCT03683862 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
0.018 or 0.022 Bracket Slot System More Effective in Orthodontic Treatment?
NCT02080338 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Orthodontic Treatment of Dental Crowding
NCT04756843 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Orthodontic Approaches to Correct Deep Bite in Mixed Dentition Patients
NCT03641196 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Printed Orthodontic Molar Distalizer
NCT07191158 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Of Oral Health-Related Quality Of Life In Patients Wearing Vacuum Formed Thermoplastic Retainers Constructed On Conventional Stone Models And On 3D Reconstructed Orthodontic Study Model
NCT02866617 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Lingual and Labial Fixed Orthodontic Appliances in the Treatment of Crowding Cases
NCT03850951 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Gold Fixed Retainers Compared to Conventional Stainless Steel Retainers
NCT07280455 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RCT Comparing Invisalign and Traditional Orthodontic Treatment
NCT04556448 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Arch Expansion Changes Between Passive Self-ligating and Conventional Brackets
NCT03363620 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Prefabricated Versus 3D-Printing Myofunctional Appliances
NCT04810286 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA