Influence of Surface Sealants on the Quality of Posterior Restorations With Bulk Fill Composites
NCT03924830 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 53
Last updated 2026-05-15
Summary
Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controled, parallel, double-blinded, with three groups, that aims to evaluate if there is some advantage in applying surface sealants (Biscover, Bisco, USA or Permaseal, Ultradent, USA) associated with a Bulk Fill Composite (Tetric N-Ceram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent,Liechtenstein). Volunteers will be selected and recruited,following inclusion criteria and pre-established exclusion. All volunteers will be informed and sign a term of clarification and consent. 53 enrolled patients will receive 159 Class I or Class II dental restorations, made in three different ways, one from each experimental group (no sealant, or one of the evaluated surface sealants). Occlusal or Proximo-occlusal lesions will receive the selected treatments separated by groups. Group Bulk without surface sealant (BNS), Group Bulk and Biscover (BSB), and Group Bulk and Permaseal (BSP). Immediate post-operative tooth sensitivity will be evaluated after one week. Restorations will be evaluated every 6 months for pain assessment, shape, fractures, staining or recurrent caries, using scores. To determine in which group each tooth will be enrolled, the authors will randomize the teeth.
Conditions
- Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Bulk without surface sealant
Adhese SE self-etch adhesive system will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions in 53 teeth.Then, the Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill composite will be used in increments of no more than 4 mm, using the bulk restoration technique, and each increment will be photoactivated for 40 seconds.
- PROCEDURE
-
Bulk with Biscover
Adhese SE self-etch adhesive system will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions in 53 teeth.Then, the Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill composite will be used in increments of no more than 4 mm, using the bulk restoration technique, and each increment will be photoactivated for 40 seconds. After the restoration is completed, biscover surface sealant will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- PROCEDURE
-
Bulk with Permaseal
Adhese SE self-etch adhesive system will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions in 53 teeth.Then, the Tetric N-Ceram Bulk fill composite will be used in increments of no more than 4 mm, using the bulk restoration technique, and each increment will be photoactivated for 40 seconds. After the restoration is completed, Permaseal surface sealant will be applied according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Universidade Federal Fluminense
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
MARCOS O BARCELEIRO, DDS, PHD · Universidade Federal Fluminense
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-03-30
- Completion
- 2026-05-08
Countries
- Brazil
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07003360 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Resin Cement Composition on the Longevity of Intraradicular Post of Endodontically Treated Teeth
NCT03491527 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Treatment in Cariously Exposed Teeth
NCT06802549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Effect of Clinical Experience on the Quality of Obturation and Periapical Changes of Teeth Treated With Matched Cones in Combination With Bioceramic Sealer
NCT06260423 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injection-Molding Vs. Incremental Packing of Resin Composite in Cavitated Posterior Teeth
NCT05020093 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Postoperative Hypersensitivity and Digital Radiographic Assessment of a Zinc Modified Versus a Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement in Deep Carious Lesion: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT03285022 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Compariing a Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant To A Conventional Resin
NCT04052802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Basic Filling Material in Class I and II Posterior Restorations
NCT02763085 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Bioceramic Putty MTA Versus MTA in Pulpotomy of Immature Permanent Molars
NCT06219824 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Evaluation of Organically Modified Ceramic Resin Composite Versus Bulkfill Resin in Proximal Posterior Cavities
NCT04677023 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Deep Carious Lesions With Selective Caries Removal, Partial or Full Pulpotomy
NCT04807244 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
NCT05499494 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns
NCT06348979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
NCT03283280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Incidence of Postoperative Pain After Using Different Types of Sealers
NCT05841290 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Sealants vs Conventional Sealants in Permanent Molars
NCT03779893 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fill Composite Versus Conventional Nano-hybrid Composite in Cervical Cavities
NCT06394440 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced FRC Base and Bonded CAD/CAM Resin Composite Endocrowns Versus Conventional Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns in Posterior Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05337358 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods
NCT06227390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite
NCT02393989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficiency of Bioactive Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT06493942 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of a Chemically Activated Composite Resin Alkasite With Resin Composite in Atypical Caries Lesions of Deciduous Teeth
NCT04195022 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Preheated Versus Conventional Bulk Fill Resin Composite
NCT04152460 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA