MedTrace Logo

Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla.(Group B ) A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

NCT03212820 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2017-07-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

20 patients were selected requiring implant placement and divided randomly into two groups (10 in each group)

* for the study group, starter drill is used to locate the point of insertion as planned then pilot drill is also used to the full desired working length after that all other sequential drills are used at a low speed (50-70 rpm) without irrigation .
* In the study group: implant will be inserted in the low speed osteotomy site.
* In the control group: implants will be inserted in the conventional prepared osteotomy site.
* For both groups there is no surgical guide used.
* The flap will then be copiously irrigated with saline in preparation for closure.
* The flap will then be closed using interrupted 4/0 resorbable sutures.

Conditions

  • Bone Resorption

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Drilling at low speed

PROCEDURE

Drilling at conventional or high speed

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-07-31
Primary Completion
2017-08-31
Completion
2017-09-30

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03212820 on ClinicalTrials.gov