MedTrace Logo

Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling Effect on Implant Stability

NCT05824949 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2023-04-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

A total of 80 implants were placed in the posterior region of the maxilla in 40 patients in a split-mouth design. Bone quality was classified into type I, II, III, IV, or V as assessed preoperatively on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) . Primary implant stability was measured with insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis (ISQ values). Secondary stability was measured by ISQ at abutment installation.

Conditions

  • Implant Therapy

Interventions

PROCEDURE

osseodensification drilling

Implant mechanical and biological stability measured using ISQ values at the time of implant placement and at abutment connection for 40 implants placed in the posterior maxillary area using the osseodensification protocol.

PROCEDURE

conventional drilling

Implant mechanical and biological stability measured using ISQ values at the time of implant placement and at abutment connection for 40 implants placed in the posterior maxillary area using the conventional drilling protocol.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Arab American University (Palestine)

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-04-04
Primary Completion
2022-06-01
Completion
2023-02-01

Countries

  • Palestinian Territories

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05824949 on ClinicalTrials.gov