Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Osseodensification Versus Traditional Drilling Protocol
NCT06307691 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 26
Last updated 2024-03-19
Summary
For the purpose of the study, patients will be divided into two groups, i.e., Group A and Group B. In Group (A), 14 immediate implants will be placed using traditional drilling technique, while in Group (B), 14 immediate implants will be placed using OD drilling technique Osseodensification is a system for implant osteotomy preparation, it compresses the cancellous bone around the revolving drills. It largely improves low bone volume by physically increasing the interlocking between the bone and the implant surface. The Densah burs enhances bone density while generating the least amount of heat.
Traditional oversized drilling is the regular manufacturer recommended technique of drilling. It functions by cutting the bone during osteotomy preparation by sharp fluted drills. The undersizing of the preparation allows the implant to partially compact the bone during insertion.
The objective of the current study is to compare between osseodensification drilling protocol versus traditional undersized drilling protocol in immediate implant placement in anterior maxillary region in terms of implant stability.
Conditions
- Implant Complication
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional drilling
Atraumatic extraction, followed by sequential drilling using conventional drills
- PROCEDURE
-
Osseodensification drilling
Atraumatic extraction, followed by osteotomy prepared using densah bur (sequential drilling)
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Omar M Ibrahim, Master · Cairo University
-
Omnia K Tawfik, Lecturer · Cairo University
-
Hany El Nahaas, Professor · Cairo Unversity
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 60 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-03-06
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-20
- Completion
- 2026-12-20
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
"Osseodensification Efficacy on Molar Septum Expansion in Immediate Molar Implant Placement
NCT07108361 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Osseodensification on the Peri-implant Condition
NCT06689969 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Effect of Osseodensification on Implant Stability in Posterior Maxilla
NCT04442763 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Biological Drilling Osteotomy Protocol Versus Conventional Drilling Osteotomy Protocol
NCT06992557 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Osseodensification and Conventional Drilling on the Stability of Tapered and Cylindrical Implants.
NCT07244185 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Conventional and Ultrasonic Implant Site Preparation
NCT03357406 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Density Before and After Placement of Implant Using Osseodensification Technique
NCT06268639 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Shield vs Conventional Immediate Implant
NCT03587597 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla.(Group C ) A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT03220789 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Dimensional Alveolar Bone Changes in Immediate Post Extraction Implant Placement
NCT06515509 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Osseodensification Versus Conventional Implant Site
NCT04189718 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla.(Group B ) A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT03212820 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Trephination-based Versus Drilling-based Guided Dental Implant Placement
NCT05295082 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Low Speed Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Technique on Crestal Bone Level in Maxilla.(Group A ) A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT03220815 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Stability of Implants Placed in Partially Edentulous Maxilla With Poor Bone Quality Via New Reverse Drilling Technique Versus Osteotome Technique.
NCT04541641 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional Methods
NCT05390996 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
CD vs IOD Opposing Mandibular IOD : Bone Height Changes of the Premaxilla
NCT06752642 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Correlation Between Radiographic Bone Density in CBCT and Implant Stability Quotient Value: Clinical Observational Study
NCT03164759 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Thread Designs on Primary Stability of Dental Implant Using Osseodensification Technique in Posterior Maxilla : Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07242716 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant With Different Filling Materials
NCT05878392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Passive Fit of CAD/CAM Screw-retained Metal Frameworks Versus Screwmented Ones
NCT04372901 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Peri-implant Bone Behaviour Using Two Drilling Techniques in Posterior Maxilla
NCT06770231 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
: SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE VERSUS EMPTY SOCKET TECHNIQUE
NCT02992366 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Two Different Digital Construction Techniques of Implant-assisted Overdentures
NCT06720389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Different Surgical Drilling Protocols in Posterior Maxilla
NCT06334081 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA