Clinical Performance of a Glass-ionomer Restorative System: A 6-year Evaluation
NCT02888912 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 54
Last updated 2016-09-05
Summary
The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the clinical performances of a glass ionomer restorative system with a micro hybrid resin based composite in class I and class II cavities. A total of 140 (80 class I and 60 class II) lesions in 59 patients were restored with a glass ionomer restorative system (Equia) or a micro hybrid composite(Gradia Direct). Restorations were evaluated at baseline and yearly during 6 years according to the modified-USPHS criteria. Data were analyzed with Cohcran's Q and McNemar's tests (p\<0.05).
Conditions
- Dental Caries
Interventions
- OTHER
-
EQUIA
Placing glass ionomer restorations, the dentin and enamel of cavities were conditioned with 20% polyacrylic acid for 20 seconds, washed, and briefly dried. Equia Fil was injected into the cavity. Isolation was maintained using cotton rolls and a saliva ejector. After the setting time of 2.5 minutes, the restoration was polished wet using high-speed fine diamonds. When the restoration was briefly dried, Equia Coat was applied and photocured for 20 seconds using a photo-curing light.
- OTHER
-
Gradia Direct Posterior
The enamel and dentin were conditioned with G-Bond adhesive using a microtip applicator, left undisturbed for five to 10 seconds, and then dried thoroughly for five seconds with oil-free air under air pressure, Gradia Direct Posterior resin was applied with the incremental technique (2 mm thick layers) and light-cured for 20 seconds. Finally, the restoration was shaped with finishing diamonds and silicon instruments.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hacettepe University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Sevil Gurgan, Phd, DDS · Hacettepe University School of Dentistry
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 15 Years
- Max Age
- 37 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-05-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-08-31
- Completion
- 2015-08-31
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Performances of 3-different Tooth-colored Restorative Materials in Class-II Cavities
NCT06211582 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Restorative Glass Ionomer and a Bulk-fill Composite Resin
NCT04685967 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Compomer and Composite Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: 24 Months Results
NCT04678141 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Glass Ionomer Versus Resin Composite Restorations
NCT04488380 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of GIOMER Based Resin Composite
NCT06021028 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Partial Caries Removal in Permanent Molars Restored Using Giomer
NCT06601972 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT06212141 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the 2-year Clinical Performances of Class II Restorations Using Different Restorative Materials
NCT06562868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Restorations in Permanent Teeth
NCT05583682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of SI-R21204 Versus Nano-hybrid Resin Composite: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT02823769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
CLINICAL COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT GLASS IONOMER-BASED RESTORATIVES AND A BULK-FILL RESIN COMPOSITE IN CLASS I CAVITIES: A 48-MONTH RANDOMIZED SPLIT-MOUTH CONTROLLED TRIAL
NCT05559333 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Could Bulk Fill Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Replace Composite Resins in Treating Permanent Teeth?
NCT05551130 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Performance and Occlusal Wear of Low Shrinkage Giomer Compared to Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT05949502 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Restorative Glass Ionomer and a Composite Resin for the Restoration
NCT04266210 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Class II Restorations
NCT06346756 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance Of Class I Composite Restorations After Cavity Finishing By Air Abrasion Versus Diamond Stone
NCT06107218 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Assessment of Glass Carbomer Cement
NCT03030690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Clinical Evaluation of a Posterior Glass Hybrid System vs. Composite Resin
NCT02717520 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Two Low-shrinkage Composites
NCT03708510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Highly Translucent Nano Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Filling Versus Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Patients With Proximal Carious Teeth. (A One-year Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05403008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA