Clinical Performance Evaluation of a Glass-ionomer Restorative System Evaluation
NCT03822403 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 54
Last updated 2019-01-30
Summary
The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the clinical performances of a glass ionomer restorative system with a micro hybrid resin based composite in class I and class II cavities. A total of 140 (80 class I and 60 class II) lesions in 59 patients were restored with a glass ionomer restorative system (Equia) or a micro hybrid composite(Gradia Direct). Restorations were evaluated at baseline and yearly during 9 years according to the modified-USPHS criteria. Data were analyzed with Cohcran's Q and McNemar's tests (p\<0.05).
Conditions
- Dental Caries
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
EQUIA
Placing glass ionomer restorations, the dentin and enamel of cavities were conditioned with 20% polyacrylic acid for 20 seconds, washed, and briefly dried. Equia Fil was injected into the cavity. Isolation was maintained using cotton rolls and a saliva ejector. After the setting time of 2.5 minutes, the restoration was polished wet using high-speed fine diamonds. When the restoration was briefly dried, Equia Coat was applied and photocured for 20 seconds using a photo-curing light.
- DEVICE
-
Gradia Direct Posterior
The enamel and dentin were conditioned with G-Bond adhesive using a microtip applicator, left undisturbed for five to 10 seconds, and then dried thoroughly for five seconds with oil-free air under air pressure, Gradia Direct Posterior resin was applied with the incremental technique (2 mm thick layers) and light-cured for 20 seconds. Finally, the restoration was shaped with finishing diamonds and silicon instruments.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hacettepe University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-05-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-01-01
- Completion
- 2019-01-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Reinforced Glass Ionomer Restorations
NCT04288791 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Glass Hybrid Versus Composite Restorations of Non-carious Cervical Lesions
NCT02631161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Restorative Glass Ionomer and a Bulk-fill Composite Resin
NCT04685967 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Different Composite Materials in Class III and IV Restorations.
NCT07343063 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
CLINICAL COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT GLASS IONOMER-BASED RESTORATIVES AND A BULK-FILL RESIN COMPOSITE IN CLASS I CAVITIES: A 48-MONTH RANDOMIZED SPLIT-MOUTH CONTROLLED TRIAL
NCT05559333 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Restorative Glass Ionomer and a Composite Resin for the Restoration
NCT04266210 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Clinical Evaluation of a Posterior Glass Hybrid System vs. Composite Resin
NCT02717520 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Could Bulk Fill Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Replace Composite Resins in Treating Permanent Teeth?
NCT05551130 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Injectable Composite Resins in Class I Cavities
NCT06192667 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT06212141 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Class II Restorations
NCT06346756 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Restorative Materials
NCT06637605 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Evaluation Direct and Indirect Composite Restoration in Hypomineralization Molars.
NCT05299489 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Follow-up of Indirect Restorations Luted With Different Adhesive Resin Cement
NCT05551481 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Direct Composite Veneer Restorations
NCT05842590 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of SI-R21204 Versus Nano-hybrid Resin Composite: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT02823769 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the 2-year Clinical Performances of Class II Restorations Using Different Restorative Materials
NCT06562868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Resin-hybrid Ceramic Restorations Produced Using a Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) System With Fiber-reinforced Composite Restorations
NCT06496126 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Class I Direct and Indirect Restorations Over 10 Years
NCT07081529 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Two Low-shrinkage Composites
NCT03708510 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Restorations in Permanent Teeth
NCT05583682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Class II Restorations With High-Filled Flowable Composites
NCT06346795 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth
NCT03037814 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Restorative Materials
NCT06109987 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Performance of Glass Ionomer Versus Resin Composite Restorations
NCT04488380 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA