Performance Of Class I Composite Restorations After Cavity Finishing By Air Abrasion Versus Diamond Stone
NCT06107218 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 78
Last updated 2023-11-18
Summary
The aim of the study is to reveal the performance of the resin composite restorations after finishing the cavity walls and margins using bioactive glass air abrasion particles in comparison to the routine finishing with the finishing diamond stone according to the FDI criteria for post operative sensitivity, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, secondary caries, and retention.
Conditions
- Abrasion, Dental
- Class I Dental Caries
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Bioactive Glass Air Abrasion Particles.
Finishing of cavity walls by AquaCare Air Abrasion Device using Bioactive Glass Air Abrasion Particles.
- OTHER
-
Diamond Stone.
Finishing of cavity walls using Diamond Stone.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 25 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2025-05-31
- Completion
- 2025-06-30
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Performance of Nano Fiber Reinforced Versus Conventional Nano Hybrid Composite in Restoring Premolars
NCT05808075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Highly Filled Injectable Flowable Composite for Direct Posterior Occlusal Conservative Restorations Using FDI Criteria: Two Year Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06790511 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Clinical Evaluation of Self- Cure Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Versus Conventional Bulk-Fill Resin Composite
NCT06859086 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material
NCT06317857 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT06485024 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Rct Deep Margin Elevation by Self Adhesive Composite
NCT06899412 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One-year Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Versus Conventional Incremental Posterior Restoration by FDI Criteria
NCT02891967 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Contact Tightness of Zirconomer Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Occlusoproximal Cavities in Molars
NCT06596707 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Resin Composite Restoration After Dentin Biomodification by Grape Seed Extract in Deep Carious Lesions.
NCT06780527 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Two Nano Ceramic Resin Composite in Class I Cavities
NCT04738604 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the 2-year Clinical Performances of Class II Restorations Using Different Restorative Materials
NCT06562868 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Methods of Enamel Preparation Before Pit and Fissure Sealants
NCT02594020 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05380973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT03515265 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Fiber-Reinforced Dentin Replacement Materials
NCT07320885 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Nusmile Bioflex Versus Stainless-Steel Crowns in Restoring Decayed Primary Molars with Modified Hall Technique
NCT06721741 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA