MedTrace Logo

IntuBrite Versus Macintosh for Endotracheal Intubation in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest

NCT05607836 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 86

Last updated 2022-11-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

a randomized, parallel, non-blinded trial in a single Emergency Mdeical Service in Poland within a group of 34 ground ambulances crews, comparing time and first pass success (FPS) for endotracheal intubation (ETI) in DL using the IntuBrite® (INT) and Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). intubations will be performed using INT and MCL based on an intention-to-treat analysis. The FPS time of the ETI attempt will be analysed. First attempt success will be counted.

Conditions

  • Intubation Complication
  • Cardiopulmonary Arrest

Interventions

DEVICE

IntuBrite intubation

Use of new laryngoscope IntuBrite for intubation in patients with cardiopulmonary arrest and during resuscitation

DEVICE

Macintosh laryngoscope

Use of standard Macintosh blade laryngoscope for intubation in patients with cardiac arrest and requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Medical University of Lodz

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Tomasz Gaszynski · Medical University of Lodz, Poland

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-01-01
Primary Completion
2020-01-01
Completion
2022-06-01

Countries

  • Poland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05607836 on ClinicalTrials.gov