MedTrace Logo

VL vs DL in Inexperienced Users: a Pediatric Manikin Study

NCT02991820 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 43

Last updated 2018-07-18

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

This study will compare the CMAC and Glidescope videolaryngoscopes (VL) to traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL) using either a Miller or Macintosh laryngoscope by studying the performance of users. This will involve the use of an intubating pediatric manikin to assess various aspects of endotracheal intubation by experienced and inexperienced users.

Conditions

  • Videolaryngoscopes (VL)
  • Direct Laryngoscopy (DL)
  • Inexperienced Users

Interventions

DEVICE

Miller

Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using direct laryngoscopy (DL) with a Miller laryngoscope

DEVICE

Macintosh

Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using DL with a Macintosh laryngoscope

DEVICE

C-MAC

Indirect laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using the C-MAC video laryngoscope

DEVICE

GlideScope

Indirect laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation attempted by each provider using the GlideScope video laryngoscope

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Joseph D. Tobias

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Joseph Tobias, MD · Nationwide Children's Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-06-30
Primary Completion
2017-05-31
Completion
2017-05-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02991820 on ClinicalTrials.gov