Method Evaluation Study of Truview Picture Capture Device(PCD) Versus MacIntosh Laryngoscope
NCT01530152 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 56
Last updated 2012-06-19
Summary
Aim:
The aim of the method evaluation study is a comparing study of Truview PCD™ (Picture Capture Device) laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope. The result of this study will form a basis for a possible recommendation of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope in our organisation.
The laryngoscopes are compared according to their ability to visualize the glottis area measured by the Cormack Lehane (CL) grade and the time used to get the best CL grade.
A registration of any damage of tissue/teeths caused by the laryngoscopes, and a possible decrease of the saturation will also be made.
Hypothesis:
The Truview PCD™ laryngoscope provides a better view of the vocal cords and thereby makes the intubation les difficult.
CL 1 is achieved in 90 percent of intubations with the Macintosh laryngoscope, and the hypothesis of the study is that CL 1 can be increased to 98 percent by use of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope.
Conditions
- Intubation
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Truwiev PCD laryngoscope
The aim of the method evaluation study is a comparing study of Truview PCD™ laryngoscope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope. The result of this study will form a basis for a possible recommendation of the Truview PCD™ laryngoscope in our organisation. The laryngoscopes are compared according to their ability to visualize the glottis area measured by the Cormack Lehane (CL) grade and the time used to get the best CL grade. (See figure 1.) A registration of any damage of tissue/teeths caused by the laryngoscopes, and a possible decrease of the saturation will also be made.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Aalborg University Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2012-05-31
- Completion
- 2012-05-31
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Different Types Of Laryngoscopes During Routine Intubation in Adult Patients
NCT01794611 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of the Macintosh, King Vision®, Glidescope® and AirTraq® Laryngoscopes in Routine Airway Management
NCT01914523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
C-MAC Video Stylet vs. Video Endoscope
NCT03749837 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Out-of-Hospital Randomized Comparison of Video-assisted Endotracheal Intubation
NCT01635660 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
NCT02804451 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laryngoscope Prototype Tested Against the Traditional Macintosh Blade
NCT00378170 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intubation During Resuscitation
NCT02277951 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Vocal Cord Views With the Classical Miller, Wis-Hipple and C-MAC Size 1 Blades in Young Children
NCT03053583 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
C-MAC Video Laryngoscope and VS-CMAC Fiberoptic Stylet for Awake Endoscopic Intubation in Predicted Difficult Airways
NCT04532138 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Storz CMAC Laryngoscope
NCT00956592 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion
NCT04936516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Videolaryngoscopes (C-MAC vs Airtraq) for Awake Intubation
NCT05428995 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video Laryngoscopy in Pre-hospital Critical Care
NCT02035449 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of McGrath and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Insertion of a Double Lumen Tube by Residents
NCT03710096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pediatric Intubation With Difficult Airway
NCT02291627 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscopes for Double Lumen Tube Intubations
NCT02305667 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Rate of Successful Intubation and the Required Time for Intubation, Using Vie Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope Will be Compared, in Order to Evaluate the Efficacy of Vie Scope in Comparison With Macintosh in Expected Easy Airways.
NCT06149338 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation
NCT04759300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
McGRATH MAC Video Laryngoscope
NCT02250521 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of McGrath MAC®, Pentax-AWS® and Macintosh Direct Laryngoscopes for Nasotracheal Intubation
NCT03337555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Video-Assisted Laryngoscopy Education
NCT01815983 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Videolaryngoscope Versus Fiberoptic Bronchoscope for the Awake Intubation
NCT02169232 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
CMAC® Versus Airtraq® and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Tracheal Intubation.
NCT01031940 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between C-mac,Pentax Video Laryngoscopes and Machintosh Laryngoscope
NCT07255235 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING